(At Least 72 FEMA Camps Are Ready To Put You Into Detention Now.)

(Section 1031 of the NDAA of 2012 authorizes the military to hold or imprison ANY PERSON in the United States without a trial or arrest warrant. This means it doesn’t matter if you are accused of being a terrorist or anything else. Because the Military can KIDNAP you and not arrest you means you can be KIDNAPPED by the military for ANY REASON at ANY TIME and detained/held/killed for ANY REASON.

Section 1031 list various reasons for the authorization of military force. The reasons don’t matter because the military does not have to give you an American Citizen ANY REASON FOR YOUR BEING KIDNAPPED BY THE MILITARY!!!!!!!!!

Do you understand now?

You will only understand if you are not slowly boilng in a pot like a frog. The frog doesn’t perceive the imminent danger of his demise. The frog can be equated to an American who only watches and listens to the state run media cnn,nbc,cbs,abc,pbs etc. He is not aware of any danger. Think “out of the POT!”) Record Master

FEMA Concentration Camps: Locations and Executive Orders

http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifThe National Defense Act Also Authorizes Americans To Be Held In FEMA Camps Listen To This Radio Show Explaining What Congress Is Doing To Turn America Into A Police State!

*****************************************************************************************
Beware of Homeland Security Training for Local Law Enforcement, by An Insider

By James Wesley, Rawles

Beware of Homeland Security Training for Local Law Enforcement, by An Insider
*****************************************************************************************

I’ve been in law enforcement for the past 18 years. I have attended a variety of training over those years. During the 1990s, most training I attended was community-oriented, sponsored by local agencies or private companies specializing in police training. Themes common to training of the past included topics such as Constitutional rights, community partnerships, youth-oriented programs and problem-oriented policing.

During the past several years, I have witnessed a dramatic shift in the focus of law enforcement training. Law enforcement courses have moved away from a local community focus to a federally dominated model of complete social control. Most training I have attended over the past two years have been sponsored by Department of Homeland Security (DHS), namely the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

No matter what topic the training session concerns, every DHS sponsored course I have attended over the past few years never fails to branch off into warnings about potential domestic terrorists in the community. While this may sound like a valid officer and community safety issue, you may be disturbed to learn how our Federal government describes a typical domestic terrorist.

These federal trainers describe the dangers of “extremists” and “militia groups” roaming the community and hiding in plain sight, ready to attack. Officers are instructed how to recognize these domestic terrorists by their behavior, views and common characteristics. State data bases are kept to track suspected domestic terrorists and officers are instructed on reporting procedures to state and federal agencies. The state I work in, like many others, have what is known as a “fusion center” that compiles a watch list of suspicious people.

So how does a person qualify as a potential domestic terrorist? Based on the training I have attended, here are characteristics that qualify:

Expressions of libertarian philosophies (statements, bumper stickers)
Second Amendment-oriented views (NRA or gun club membership, holding a CCW permit)
Survivalist literature (fictional books such as “Patriots” and “One Second After”)
Self-sufficiency (stockpiling food, ammo, hand tools, medical supplies)
Fear of economic collapse (buying gold and barter items)
Religious views concerning the book of Revelation (apocalypse, anti-Christ)
Expressed fears of Big Brother or big government
Homeschooling
Declarations of Constitutional rights and civil liberties
Belief in a New World Order conspiracy

(I would say that many people have the above “characteristics”. I exercise my right to freedom of speech. I am a member of the NRA. I have read survivalist literature and have watched some survivalist shows on tv. I believe in storing up some supplies for a rainy day. An obama communist socialist economic collapse is comming. I believe the bible. I have expressed my destain for what congress has done. I know home schooling is good for children. I have quoted the US Constitution. I do think there is a new world order on the way thanks to the evil members of various factions. So do i qualify?) Record Master

A recent training session I attended encouraged law enforcement agencies to work with business owners to alert police when customers appear to be stockpiling items. An example was given that a federal agent was monitoring customers at a well known hunting and fishing retail outlet and noting who was purchasing certain items.

This is something to remember the next time you purchase a case of ammo at one of these popular outdoor sports retail stores.

NOTE:

Methods of developing evidence of terrorist activity from virtually any search have also been discussed. Various common materials which may be associated with homemade explosives are listed, such as lengths of pipe, gunpowder, matches, flammable liquids and fireworks. Officers are told when these items are found, they can be listed as “bomb making materials”.

The training even goes so far as to instruct officers that the items are cleverly disguised as legitimate, such as gasoline stored near a lawn mower, pipes stored in a shop building or gunpowder stored with reloading materials.

(Is there any doubt now that the obama regime is trying to set you up for a military “kidnapping” as he has requested in the NDAA of 2012? Obama is cleverly disguised as an American citizen but he is not. Obama himself has been painted as a legitimate president but he is not.) Record Master

One course I attended used the example of a person employed as a plumber being the target of a search warrant. In this example, the officers were told how to use his employment as a plumber as further evidence of terrorism. The suspect’s employment would be described as an elaborate scheme to justify possessing pipes and chemicals so as to have bomb making materials readily available. Based on this example, all plumbers are potential pipe bomb makers. All gun dealers are plotting to provide arms to gangs or terrorists. All pest control companies are preparing mass poisonings.

By using this logic, simply having the ability to do something criminal automatically makes the person guilty of plotting the crime. With all the various methods of manufacturing methamphetamine, it would also be easy to claim that a disassembled clandestine drug lab was located during the search. In other words, it is easy to frame anyone for possessing bomb making materials (or other crimes) if the officer knows what items to list in the report and how to link these items to terrorism.

Another common tactic used in DHS sponsored training is the slander of certain ideologies by linking an erroneous characteristic to a particular group.

These groups hold the anniversaries of certain dates as significant such a Ruby Ridge, Waco and Hitler’s birthday
They oppose abortion, support gun rights and are affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan
They are fearful of big government, espouse support for the Constitution and want to kill police officers
These groups collect firearms, survivalist books and explosives
These extremists read books such as Patriots, One Second After and The Anarchist Cookbook
They are religious zealots, reading the book of Revelation, speak of the second coming of Christ and plan mass murders to summon the end of the world
These people grow their own food, raise livestock and plot attacks on commercial food production facilities

Do you see how this tactic works? List common characteristics of libertarian/conservative minded people, then throw in a slanderous accusation. If A and B apply, then you should automatically presume C applies as well.

If they were disturbed by the incidents at Ruby Ridge and Waco, then obviously they must celebrate Hitler’s birthday. Officers are being conditioned to assume criminal and terroristic views when politically-incorrect views are observed. As simple-minded and ridiculous as this line of thinking is, there are some officers who unfortunately buy into this.

(A Politically incorrect view would be to indicate obama is not a US citizen.) Record Master

Another training session I attended two years ago discussed the dangerous of people who have strong views of the U.S. Constitution. One trainer made the statement that “these people actually believe the Second Amendment gives them the personal right to own a gun.” Of course, the trainer failed to mention that our Founding Fathers, as well as recent Supreme Court rulings, verify this view as being completely accurate. The obvious attempt here was to suggest to officers that the Second Amendment does not apply to individual gun ownership and to be suspicious of anyone who holds such a view.

It was also stressed to be cautious of anyone who quotes the Constitution and even worse, actually possesses a copy of this radical document.

Incredibly, in the United States of America today belief in our founding legal principles is now grounds for being labeled a domestic terrorism.

Imagine how they would respond to some of the known statements of Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry or George Mason concerning the issue of individual liberty and limited government. It is true that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.

There are several things that we, the patriotic, self-sufficient defenders of liberty can do to counter this effort. First, get involved in local elections. Elect county sheriffs who will not fall for such propaganda nor go along with oppressive federal agendas. Elect city council members who will not tolerate such behavior by their city police department. Elect state representatives who will hold state agencies accountable for participating in such tactics. Bring these issues up during elections, demand a public statement on their position on such propaganda and a promise to stand against these efforts while in office.

Second, get to know your local law enforcement officers. It is much more difficult for DHS to brainwash officers against people they personally know. When you are viewed as a neighbor, friend or fellow Christian, these officers are far less likely to submit your name to a terrorist watch list or view you as a potential terrorist. We want local officers to be personally offended when they hear members of their community slandered in such ways.

Third, always be friendly and courteous when speaking to your local officers. Even if that officer has fallen for this propaganda, be sure not to resemble the negative stereotypes labeled to us. After the fifth, sixth or maybe tenth time he deals with one of us, he or she may come to realize we are of no threat to law enforcement or anyone for that matter. Eventually, the officer may attend one of these training sessions, hear the propaganda and say to himself, “This isn’t true, I’ve dealt with many people like this, they are God-fearing, liberty loving Americans, they are not the enemy!”

Please remember that there are many people in law enforcement that have not, and will never, fall for DHS propaganda. Some of the most patriotic defenders of liberty and believers in self-sufficiency can be found in law enforcement.

The general public can do its part by electing liberty-minded candidates to office and educating their friends and neighbors about issues important to all of us.

(I would add don’t be silenced by the threat of being labeled by the federal government if you speak out about the corruption that is taking place in the ferederal government.

Do continue to be aware and make others aware of the federal governments efforts to take away your freedoms and ignore the US Constitution.) Record Master

Remember what Patrick Henry said: “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”

“There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable–and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.”

Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death Patrick Henry

FEMA Camps: Seeking Contractors and Personnel to Staff and Confine
***************************************************************************************

For years, America’s crept closer to totalitarian rule. Notably, the 1996 Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act eased surveillance and death penalty restrictions, eroded habeas protection, and smoothed the way for repressive measures to follow.

Post-9/11, they proliferated. Constitutional protections have been systematically eliminated. FY 2012 NDAA provisions destroy fundamental Bill of Rights ones, including Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights.

The Fifth Amendment says, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury..”

Moreover, no one shall “be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb….be compelled (to bear) witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law….”

The Fourteenth Amendment says, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are” US citizens.

“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of (US) citizens..nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law….”

Overall, America’s Constitution protects against unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious laws not based on rule of law principles.

Supreme Court rulings affirmed Bill of Rights protections. In November 2008, Justice Anthony Kennedy sided with a majority ruling, saying:

“After carefully considering the relevance of the 10 inviolable rights that comprise the ideological foundation on which our nation is built, the court finds that these basic freedoms remain important for the time being, and should not be overturned.”

“Until such time as it can be definitively proven that citizens no longer require the protections provided by the Bill of Rights, it shall remain the principal legal guidance for the United States of America.”

Under Obama and the 112th Congress, inviolability no longer holds. Tyranny replaced it. America’s no different than other totalitarian states. As a result, no one challenging state power is safe.

Denouncing imperial lawlessness can be criminalized. So can defending right over wrong. Constitutional protections no longer apply.

People power alone can restore them. There’s no other way.

***************************************************************************************

Section 1031 Subtitle D -Detainee Matters

(15) (b) says a covered person ia (A person). You need to be aware that “A person” is any person in outside or inside the United States.

Section 1031 (c) (1) Detention under the law of war without trial

Section 1032 (1) (2) armed forces of the United States shall hold a person described in paragraph (2)

Paragraph (2) covered persons- The requirement in paragraph (1) shall apply to any person whose detention is authorized under section 1031.

(Section 1031 of the NDAA of 2012 authorizes the military to hold or imprison ANY PERSON in the United States without a trial or arrest warrant. This means it doesn’t matter if you are accused of being a terrorist or anything else. Because the Military can KIDNAP you and not arrest you means you can be KIDNAPPED by the military for ANY REASON at ANY TIME and detained/held/killed for ANY REASON.

Section 1031 list various reasons for the authorization of military force. The reasons don’t matter because the military does not have to give you an American Citizen ANY REASON FOR YOUR BEING KIDNAPPED BY THE MILITARY!!!!!!!!!

Do you understand now?) Record Master

Tagged with:
 


…………………………………………………………………………..

……………………………………………………………………………
Correction: I took the small amount of time to look up some information on Martha Trowbridge an it ain’t good. I found: Martha Trowbridge Radio, LLC provides inspirational, practical programming for women, in a variety of domains. With empathic inspiration for women who suffer emotional and mental agonies, The Martha Trowbridge Radio Hour focuses upon depression, trauma, complicated grief, betrayal, victimization, post-traumatic stress disorder, self-erosion, degradation, profound shame, perceived powerlessness, loneliness, and struggles with self-esteem and self-actualization.

I know think this is all a fake story of fiction. Keep that in mind as your read it. I think is is a distraction to help deter the public from the the fact obama claims to be a natural born citizen but is not therfore he is a usurper fraud president that should not have ever been on the ballot for president.

As I said above the Martha Trowbridge story is not valid and is as fake as obama’s US citizenship status as a natural born citizen. Obama’s BC is fake as is his SS number but MS Trowbridge’s story is from her fiction writing.) Record Master

Martha Trowbridge, fiction writer, reports that she has uncovered the true identity of Stanley Ann Dunham, putative President Barack Obama’s mother. She writes in her latest article, Stan The Sham, and True Love, posted at her blog, Terrible Truth, on November 15, 2011, that Dunham’s real name is Jo Ann Newman.

Martha Trowbridge Terrible Truth

Is Putative President Barack Obama’s Mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, Really Jo Ann Newman? By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Why would Obama tell us that his mother’s name is Stanley Ann Dunham when it is really Jo Ann Newman, a white teenage girl from the Bronx, New York who according to Ms. Trowbridge was Malcolm X’s teenage lover and devotee?

Is Obama telling us a lie about his mother’s true name because he wants to hide his own real identity?

Is he telling us that lie because he wanted to make himself more electable to the average American?

What would knowing that Obama’s mother’s real name is Jo Ann Newman tell us about Obama’s true identity?

And why would Obama want to hide his true identity?

Various experts have concluded that Obama’s long-form birth certificate which he posted on the internet in April 2011, is a forgery.

Obama is also using a questionable social security number issued from Connecticut and that evidence shows that he forged his Selective Service Registration application.

Ms. Trowbridge maintains that most of the pictures of Obama and his mother that the American public has been fed by Obama and his campaign have been photo shopped so as to conceal the real face of Obama’s mother. These pictures were done, among other reasons, to give Stanley Ann Dunham the appearance of having long hair when in fact she had short hair. Other facial features were also digitally changed in these photographs. So now we discover that not only has this person’s hair and face been altered but also her name. Many of Obama’s other publicly-released photographs also reveal signs of tampering and forgery.

Obama’s real name is Bâri′ M. Shabazz, born in New York City, on October 28, 1959, who was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.

Malcolm X, also known as Malcolm X Shabazz, is the biological father of Barack Obama whose real name is Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

How do we reconcile the name of Jo Ann Newman with the Stanley Ann Dunham life story that we have been provided. As we know, this alleged fabricated life story consists of, among many life events, a birth in Kansas; youthful years and schooling in Washington; schooling in Hawaii; a hasty marriage to and divorce from Barack Obama Sr.; a marriage to and divorce from Lolo Soetoro; a move to Indonesia; and the birth of Maya Soetoro in Indonesia.

Regardless of whether Obama’s biological father is Malcolm X (a “citizen of the United States”), or Obama’s legal father is Barack Obama Sr., he is still not a “natural born Citizen” and not eligible to be President as he has originally claimed.
……………………………………………………………………………

(Obama AKA bari m shabazz is the bearer of malcolm’s X’s legacy. Stanley ann dunham never existed. Jo ann newman from new york city did.

Obama’s mother’s real name was Jo ann newman who was quoted in The New York Amsterdam News about malcolm X, “you have not fallen in vain. Your ideas, your morals will be continued.” Miss newman worked in the classified Advertising Department.

Jo Ann has seen to it along with Bâri′ M. Shabazz, that malcolm jr’s identity would be reinvented just like his father malcolm X. The pieces of the fraud puzzle fit. Its all about getting “even” with the white man. Its all about hate, deception through reinvention of identity and the destruction of the “white oppressor” of the black man.

Now we know why obama has a fake birth certificate, fake ss number and fake past. His identity was faked by him and his mother who herself had a fake identity to promote and hide the fact obama was malcolm x’s son. Malcolm X lives on in the form of Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

Jo ann newman has made sure malcolm X has not fallen in vain and Bâri′ M. Shabazz aka barack obama is the result!) Record Master

Stan The Sham, And True Love by Martha Trowbridge

Ms. Trowbridge writes FICTION!

As often as she can, Martha quilts, sews, gardens, cooks, writes fiction, reads, paints with watercolor, and songwrites [ASCAP]. A strict environmentalist, she is a devotee of American Classic Films — in particular, those of the 1930’s and 1940’s. The proud, passionate mother of three German Shepherd dogs and ooodles of cats and kittens, she is hopelessly in love with The Land. A native and longtime resident of Cambridge Massachusetts, Martha and her family presently live in an antique farm house on forty-two splendid acres in the Vermont hills.


The physical signs of those injuries and/or lacerations are still present.

Is “President” Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?

Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?

Bâri′ M. Shabazz – Barack Obama’s identity at birth

Bâri′ – Muslim name meaning “Of Allah”. Malik / Malachi Malik is Arabic for Malachi [Messenger of God]. Shabazz – Malcolm X chosen Muslim last name.

Malcolm X A Life Of Reinvention

Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.

In August 1994, at the age of 34, five years younger than was his father Malcolm X at his untimely death, Bâri′ M. Shabazz was reported to have died.

From the Social Security Death Index database:

SHABAZZ, B M 28 Oct 1959 Aug 1994 (V) 34 (PE) (none specified) New York 084-54-5926

Bâri′ M. Shabazz – didn’t really die. His birth identity ‘had’ to die.

The SSDI record states that the death information for Bâri′ M. Shabazz was coded “V”.

V signifies: “Verified: Report verified with a family member or someone acting on behalf of a family member.”

The report is not coded “P“.

P signifies: “(Proof): Death Certificate Observed”.

Notice of death was made by an informant who did not present verification of his/her reporting, that is, no death certificate was presented with the notification of death.

Once in the federal system, the record was flagged as ‘PE’, meaning that an inconsistency exists between what was reported and what was recorded in the government’s files.

The first listed address for Bâri′ M. Shabazz is One street over from Malcolm X’s house!

From his conception in 1959 through shortly before Malcolm X death in 1965, Malcolm X lived just one street over from Bâri′ M. Shabazz’s first address in East Elmhurst, New York.

The person who presents himself as Barack Hussein Obama II was born on October 28, 1959, in New York City. He was born with the name Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

The names Bâri′, Malik, and Shabazz were “sacred” to Malcolm X.

Bâri′ discovered that he was the son of Malcolm X. He then wanted to complete what his father had started in the political world. But he realized that he could not do it if the world knew that he was the illegitimate son of Malcolm X, a Muslim revolutionary. Hence, he had to change his birth identity and take on a new one.

“father” Barack Obama was Malcolm X’s Kenyan friend.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz was assigned social security number 084-54-5926, issued in New York, in 1974.

Is Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bâri′ M. Shabazz, Born October 28, 1959 in New York City?

……………………………………………………………………………..

Go to a web site of the Judiciary for the State of Hawaii and to do a search of cases that have been disposed of by that State’s traffic courts

Hawaii traffic court’s web site is called eCourt Kokua.

Once at the site, click “Agree” to the terms and conditions. Then click, “Search for case details by case ID or citation number.” Once there, enter at the prompt, Case ID or Citation Number(*): 1193041MO and hit Search.”

What do these reports say and what questions does they raise? The Case ID is 1193041 MO. The name of the case is State v. Bari Shabazz which was a non-jury case. The case is characterized as a “Traffic Crime,” with a “REPORT number W50100.” The offense occurred on March 12, 1982. The charging police officer is Duane Masayuki Espinueva. The event is characterized as an “Accident Major.” The charge was driving without a valid driver’s license. The case was first filed on Tuesday, March 16, 1982, in the First Circuit, located at Kane’Ohe Division. I checked and this court is located at 45-939 Pookela Street, Kaneohe, HI 96744. The case was continued to April 5, 1982.

The record also shows that Bari Shabazz was supposed to be arraigned and enter a plea on April 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m., in Kane’ohe Traffic Court, Courtroom B, at the Kane’ohe Division. The case was continued to May 5, 1982.

On May 5, 1982, at 8:00 a.m., Bari Shabazz was supposed to again be arraigned and enter his plea in the same court room. He apparently did not appear and so the court issued a bench warrant on May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.” It appears as though the court set bail at $25.00. The record also shows the entry of “HONDA,” maybe meaning that Bari Shabazz was driving a Honda or that the prosecutor’s name was “HONDA.” The next entry is for May 5, 1982, at 8:30 a.m. The court ordered the “AP” (maybe meaning accused person) to show proof of “NEW YORK DRIVER’S LICENSE.”

The report then shows that the prosecutor on April 9, 2003, filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case. The motion was listed as “NP [nolle prosequi] 040903.” So, the charge was dismissed upon the prosecutor’s ex parte “Nolle Prosequi” motion made on April 9, 2003. “Ex parte” means that only one side made the application which in this case was the prosecutor.

The final entry was for October 30, 2005, at 8:00 a.m., when the court noted that a $-0- balance was owed, but said “Pls check.”

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Is Putative President Barack Hussein Obama II Really Bari Shabazz, Fugitive from Justice For 21 Years Following An Auto Accident in Honolulu County, Hawaii on March 12, 1982?

This information raises the following questions:

1. Is the Bari Shabazz named in this traffic court report the same person “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” and who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? If it is the same person, then that puts New Yorker Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, on March 12, 1982. Using a date of birth of October 28, 1959, this would have made Bâri′ M. Shabazz 22 years old at the time that he had this major automobile accident in Honolulu County.

2. The accident is characterized as a major accident. Chances are that Bari Shabazz and/or any passenger was taken to a local hospital in Honolulu County due to his/their injuries. If Bari Shabazz suffered any major injuries or laceration, the physical signs of those injuries and/or lacerations could still be present somewhere on his body if he is still alive.

3. Bari Shabazz was charged with driving without a driver’s license. The court ordered him to show proof of his New York driver’s license. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have told the charging police officer or the court that he did have a driver’s license and that it was one issued by the State of New York. Hence, Bari Shabazz must have been a resident of the State of New York. Bâri′ M. Shabazz was born in New York City. Also, what was Bari Shabazz doing driving in Hawaii with what should have been a New York driver’s license? Was he now living in Hawaii? Was he there on vacation? Was he there visiting family or friends? Was he going to school there?

4. On April 9, 2003, the prosecutor filed a motion to recall the bench warrant, to terminate prosecution, and close the case. Why would this case come to the attention of some local prosecutor 21 years following the initial violation of March 12, 1982? A local prosecutor does not just go looking for cases that are 21 years old and file motions to dismiss those cases. Someone must have asked that local prosecutor to dismiss the case so that the arrest warrant was cleared from the court’s and nation’s computer system.

5.Bâri′ M. Shabazz, according to the Social Security Death Index, died in August 1994. If Bâri′ M. Shabazz is the same person as is listed in this Hawaii auto accident as Bari Shabazz, why would someone care to recall his arrest warrant on April 9, 2003 or almost 9 years after his death? Surely, it could not be Bâri′ M. Shabazz who was interested since he had been dead since 1994. On the other hand, if he was not dead he would be interested.

6. On October 30, 2005, or 23 years following the date of the accident of March 12, 1982, the court again re-visits the case of Bari Shabazz, noting that he did not owe the court any money but to “Pls. check.” Why would the court again concern itself with this case on that date, especially if Bari Shabazz was dead since 1994?

7. So, is the Bari Shabazz named in this Hawaii traffic court report the same person called “Bâri′ M. Shabazz” who is listed as “B M Shabazz” in the Social Security Death Index? That question surely merits an investigation.

If he is, then that puts the New-York-born Bâri′ M. Shabazz in Honolulu County, Hawaii, the alleged birth place and once place of residence of “President”, Barack Hussein Obama II. That is a circumstantial piece of evidence that is surely worth investigating. What also supports the position that Bâri′ M. Shabazz really did not die in August 1994 and that he is still alive as Barack Hussein Obama II is that the traffic court in Hawaii was still acting on the Bari Shabazz traffic case 9 and 11 years after the alleged death in August 1994 of Bâri′ M. Shabazz.

What needs to be investigated is why the local prosecutor and court took those actions so many years after the traffic accident and at whose behest.

8. Finally, when there is an auto accident, the police do a detailed accident report. That report includes the name, addresses, date of birth, and social security number of the person involved in the accident who is charged for that accident. The driver’s license number is also included if that license is produced or otherwise verified. A physical description of the defendant is also included. The make of auto, including the year made and VIN number are also included, along with statements of witnesses. There could be a photograph of the defendant in the police record.

A thorough investigation of this matter would surely include searching the police record in Honolulu County for this report so that this information may be examined and evaluated.

Bâri′ M. Shabazz – Barack Obama’s identity at birth

Obama Mother Pictures Were Faked Because Malcolm X Is obama’s Sire

(Now you see why the usurper “obama” must hide his identity. He is the son of malcolm X. Where did he get the head scars and when? Now we know.) Record Master

 


The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed a pair of lawsuits against the national Democratic Party

Use this form to become a member of the Liberty Legal Foundation Certification Class Action against the National Democratic Party.

The lawsuits don’t ask anything about Obama’s birth or for any determination from the court about his eligibility or his birth certificate.

The national Democratic Party is the defendant, and the court is asked to enjoin officials from certifying that Obama is eligible for the office for the 2012 election.

“This complaint does not request or require this court to find that President Obama is not qualified to hold the office of president of the United States. Instead, this complaint is directed toward defining the term ‘natural-born citizen’ under the Constitution of the United States, and toward negligence or intentional misrepresentations of the Democratic Party.

“This complaint requests this court to affirm the Supreme Court’s definition of ‘natural-born citizen’ as ‘all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.’”

That definition comes from the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Minor v. Happersett from 1875.

“Natural Born Citizen” was defined by an 1875 Supreme Court ruling (Minor v. Happersett) as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.

Neither candidate in 2008, Democrat Obama nor Republican Sen. John McCain was eligible to be president

Use this form to become a member of the Certification Class Action.

“This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States.”

“Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama’s constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama’s natural-born status.”

“Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent.”

“The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee secretary of state. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama’s Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number,”

“Without such certification from the party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election,”

All states rely upon the truthfulness of representations made by the political parties that their candidates are qualified to hold the federal office for which they are nominated. By naming the National Democratic Party as the defendant the law suit not only targets the entity responsible for vetting the Democratic candidate, it also avoids taking on any state or federal government.

“The Democratic Party is a private entity, without any government immunities or government procedural advantages”.

Presidential candidates that are registered with the Federal Election Commission have standing to ask a court to keep another candidate off the ballot.

The Liberty Legal Foundation has partnered with FEC-registered Dummett, a conservative Republican who believes that the Constitution should be followed.

(This lawsuit has some muscle. It seeks to take the trash can lid off of the democratic party and reveal the scam called obama. I think this is a great idea for a lawsuit because it targets the demo party who is responsible for the HOAX obama. The lawsuit has legs also because it has partnered with FEC-registered Dummett, a conservative Republican who believes that the Constitution should be followed. He is registered with the Federal Election Commission has standing to ask a court to keep the HOAX obama off the ballot.

The cut and pasted obama “birth certificate” is not discussed in the Liberty Legal Foundation law suit. The focus is on the democratic party and the NATURAL BORN CITIZEN definition comes from the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Minor v. Happersett from 1875.

This dog can hunt and this bird can fly!) Record Master

Use this form to become a member of the Certification Class Action.

Liberty Legal files simultaneous state and federal lawsuits against the Democratic Party, requesting an injunction to prevent the DNC from certifying Obama for the 2012 ballot

Its time to take out the trash before the 2012 election and make sure its not recycled
……………………………………………………………………………
On 10/25/11 Liberty Legal Foundation filed two simultaneous lawsuits against the Democratic Party.

On 10/25/11 Liberty Legal Foundation filed two simultaneous lawsuits against the Democratic Party. Both lawsuits request injunctions prohibiting the Party from certifying that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President in the 2012 election. Without such a certification from the Party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election.

Despite numerous legal challenges, no case to date has been able to get a hearing on the merits related to Obama’s natural-born status. We have studied all of these cases in order learn from the rulings and avoid the pitfalls that stopped those lawsuits.

We learned that the only entity remaining that can be held responsible for vetting a candidate’s qualifications to hold office, is the political party that nominates the candidate. All states rely upon the truthfulness of representations by the political parties, that their candidates are qualified to hold the federal office for which they are nominated. By naming the National Democratic Party as the defendant we not only target the entity responsible for vetting their candidate, we also avoid taking on any state or federal government.

The Democratic Party is a private entity, without any government immunities or government procedural advantages.

You can join our lawsuit as a class member and be part of this challenge! We have a class for all people that object to having a Presidential candidate appear on the ballot who is not Constitutionally qualified to hold the office. If you agree that the Constitution should be followed, please add your voice to ours. Please join our class action lawsuit to protect the legitimacy of the ballot.

Use this form to become a member of the Liberty Legal Foundation Certification Class Action against the National Democratic Party.
…………………………………………………..
Neither candidate in 2008 was eligible to be president

by HoaxDetector

Listen to internet radio with HoaxDetector on Blog Talk Radio

…………………………………………………..
Neither candidate in 2008, Democrat Obama nor Republican Sen. John McCain was eligible to be president.

McCain was born outside of the United States at a U.S. base in the Panama Canal Zone, and Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen.

25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the ‘Full Text of Case.

New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the runup to the ’08 election.

Leo Donofrio

“This is the very definition of ‘Orwellian’ Fascism. It’s propaganda. And there is no place for it in the United States. The sacrifices for truth and justice which created and have sustained this nation are wantonly debased by the subversive deception emenating from Justia.com servers.”

“We do not know at this point if Justia personnel were behind this or if their site was hacked. That being said, Justia’s reaction to my last report (in July) mirrored the deception of the sabotage. Instead of addressing the proof, Justia quietly and with stealth un-scrubbed the evidence without acknowledging or addressing the issue at all. And they placed ‘.txt robots’ on their URLs for the two previously identified cases so the Wayback Machine could no longer provide historical snapshots of those cases as published at Justia,” Donofrio explained.

He said he found 25 instances of tampering, and in some cases not only was the case scrubbed, the numerical citation also was taken out.

“The reality that both candidates eligibility was questionable according to Minor v. Happersett appears to have been known and handled by somebody’s legal team.

“McCain clearly does not meet the definition since he was born in Panama. And since Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen, the current POTUS doesn’t meet the Supreme Court’s definition of a natural-born citizen either. Minor v. Happersett has, therefore, been the subject of an intense disinformation campaign. Falsehoods about the case have been widely spread,” he said.

He said the most common are that Minor was a voting rights case and is not binding on citizenship issues, or that it was overruled.

But he said both criticisms are false.

Donofrio explained that the pattern of sabotage was consistent: The original documents included the Minor reference and subsequent copies did not.

Dianna Cotter wrote in the Portland Civil Rights Examiner: “This was done in these specific cases in order to prevent their being found by Internet researchers long before anyone had even begun to look for them, even before Obama would win the Democratic nomination at the DNC Convention in Denver, Colo., in August ’08. This is premeditation and intent to deceive.”

She noted that attorneys working on arguments always would return to the originals from the Supreme Court, “but 99.99 percent of the population has no access to dusty law texts or expensive legal research services such as Lexis and Westlaw.

“The manipulation at Justia.com diluted the importance of Minor by killing the citations in Supreme Court cases spanning over 100 years. Since Google most often returns Justia.com’s version of the case being searched for as the first or second hit, Justia’s version of Supreme Court opinions are most influential in the blogosphere’s forums and comments. Erasing those citations and text on the Internet literally erases the importance of Minor and its precedents to millions of Americans otherwise unlikely to ever step into physical Law Library,” she wrote.

Obama was elected through a scam of hiding facts about his citizenship

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=358645

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/09/multiple-instances-of-historical-scholarship-conclusively-establish-the-supreme-courts-holding-in-minor-v-happersett-as-standing-precedent-on-citizenship-obama-not-eligible/

(Leo Donofrio has added additional evidence to the fact obama is a HOAX/FRAUD. Not only was his “birth certificate” a scam, so was information about previous cases of law concerning the requirement that a president be a NATUAL BORN CITIZEN. Obama’s circle of minions has seen to it that the public was not given all the facts about supreme court law that proves obama is a illegitimate president because he is NOT a natural born citizen.

“Natural Born Citizen” was defined by an 1875 Supreme Court ruling (Minor v. Happersett) as children born of two U.S. citizens – regardless of the location of the birth. It found: “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

Obama is an ILLEGAL “president”. Why hasn’t anyone in congress or the media spoken out about the usurper “president?) Record Master

Obama is acting like a dictator. Congress is doing nothing to stop him. He is paying his zars that were appointed by him to run the government bypassing congress. Congress has allowed obama to setup a shadow government.

 

Dr. Corsi: Full Obama Eligibility Presentation

(Obama is a no record. Not only can’t he validate his US citizenship he can’t validate anything of his past. People who are not brain dead know this means he is a fraud and imposter. The enemy within.) Record Master

DURING TIMES OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT,

TELLING THE TRUTH

BECOMES A REVOLUTIONARY ACT.

- George Orwell

 

EXPERTS AGREE OBAMA HAS PRODUCED A FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE FROM THE NORDYKE TWINS CERTIFICATES.


Exhibit 3: Susan Elizabeth Nordyke, birth certificate number 10637, positive
………………………………………………………………………..


Exhibit 4: Gretchen Carter Nordyke, birth certificate number 10638, positive

……………………………………………………………………………


Exhibit 5: Barack Obama, birth certificate number 10641

The ’61′ and the ’1063′ were copied directly as an image from a Nordyke birth certificate number, most likely in Adobe software

The transference of the Nordyke birth certificate number to the Obama document was a multi-step process

The forger could not paste the Nordyke birth certificate number directly into the Obama document, because the fourth number in the ’10637′ or ’10638′ sequence needed to be changed to a ’4,’ and a ’1′ had to be added onto the end, so the Obama birth certificate number would read ’10641.

Since the short-form Certification of Live Birth released during the 2008 campaign listed Obama’s birth certificate number as 10641, any forger obviously would have to make the long-form birth certificate the same number.

Changing the “3″ to a “4,” as opposed to creating a new “4″ and pasting it into the sequence, was a preferable strategy because altering the existing number would allow a forger to maintain the digit’s spacing with the other numbers in the sequence, as well as the digit’s width and height.
…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
Mara Zebest, the nationally recognized computer expert who has served as contributing author and technical editor for many books on Adobe software, agrees that forgers used the Nordyke twins’ document as a template.

The Kapiolani text was cut and pasted from another document, such as the Nordyke twins certificate, is the fact that the text can be lined up identically with Obama’s certificate.

In Obama’s certificate, the text does not line up in the left margin (as it does with the Nordyke certificate), but instead is centered on Obama’s certificate – which wouldn’t happen when a typist is typing the information and the carriage return goes to the left margin edge.

Analyzing the letter groupings, it looks like the forgers cut-and-pasted the hospital name from the Nordyke twins directly onto the Obama birth certificate, taking pains only to sharpen the letters to make them more legible.

Zebest attributed the curvature observed in the Obama birth certificate to the curvature observed in the Nordyke photostats.

“For me, the Nordyke image explains the inspiration for the curvature effect (and trust me, it is just that – an effect – even down to the shadow.”

Zebest was struck by the similarity of the letter groupings in both documents. She noted the closeness of the “ani” in “Kapiolani”; the closeness of the “ty” in “Maternity”; the touching “yn”; the touching “al” in “Gynecological”; and the closeness of “Ho” and “sp” in “Hospital” – letter groupings that appear almost identical in the Nordyke document and the Obama birth certificate.

The Kapiolani text was cut and pasted from the Nordyke twins certificates.

…………………………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………….
A prominent software engineer and a high-level programmer for a state government also claims the Obama birth certificate released by the White House was forged by using as templates the birth certificates of twins born in Hawaii one day after the president.

He previously, as WND reported, presented evidence that the signature of Obama’s mother on the president’s document is proof of fraud.

Mathematical ‘proof’ Obama birth certificate a forgery. Prominent software engineer presents ‘self-evident’ analysis.

He also believes forgers used the registration numbers of the birth certificates belonging to Gretchen and Susan Nordyke, 10637 and 10638, to create the Obama birth certificate number, 10641.

“The ’61′ and the ’1063′ were copied directly as an image from a Nordyke birth certificate number, most likely in Adobe software,” the software engineer asserted to WND. “Then the ’3′ was turned to a ’4,’ and the last ’1′ was appended to the number sequence as a separate image.”

The transference of the Nordyke birth certificate number to the Obama document was a multi-step process

The forgery should be obvious, even to the non-expert,” he concluded. “Even if the modification of the ’3′ into the ’4′ is not apparent to someone not trained in digital image manipulation, the tonal difference between the dark, solid-black, bitmap-like first five digits in the Obama birth certificate number and the softer, fuzzier, and more pixelated quality of the final ’1′ in the sequence is apparent to even the untrained eye under modest magnification of the document.
……………………………………………………………………………

(“The forgery should be obvious, even to the non-expert.” “The softer, fuzzier, and more pixelated quality of the final ’1′ in the sequence is apparent to even the untrained eye under modest magnification of the document.”

It is OBVIOUS to me obama has only produced a FORGED document.

It is also OBVIOUS to me obama CANNOT validate his US citizenship.

It should be OBVIOUS to everyone obama is an ILLEGAL ALIEN that CANNOT produce a VALID document but has produced a FORGED document to validate his US citizenship.

Why is congress ignoring the fact that obama is an ILLEGAL ALIEN who has no valid document proving he is a US citizen?) Record Master

State programmer identifies template for Obama ‘forgery’ / High-level engineer demonstrates how Nordyke birth certificates used

Obama’s qualifications for president were never reviewed but the Senate changed the focus of the issue, with Senate Resolution 511.

Natural Born Citizen for Dummies
Arlen Williams

Natural Born Citizen For Dummies

We now live in an America with not only an anti-American president by his behavior, but by his autobiography, a fictitious one. Our Congress is complicit, by its failure to abide by the Constitution, or to even seek to do so, at the time of his confirmation. There were no challenges as constitutionally provided. Do we have a Supreme Court which has the integrity to correct this, or in its failure to do so, or thus far to even observe the constitutional standing of the Sovereign U.S. Citizens who have brought this crisis to their attention, does it also invalidate itself?
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
(Up until Feb. 28, 2008 four democrate senators tried to amend the Constitutional provision of the natural born citizen clause. On April 10, 2008, “unable to alter or remove” the requirement, the Senate changed the focus of the issue, with Senate Resolution 511, which addressed Sen. John McCain’s qualifications as a “natural-born citizen.”. Obama’s qualifications never were reviewed.

The reason obama’s qualifications were never reviewed is because obama couldn’t validate his US citizenship nor advocate his natural born citizenship status.

Obama is not a natural born citizen because his “father” or sire was born in kenya.

Certain members of congress have worked hard to cover for obama and the fact he is a usurper “president”.

In my opinion ALL 535 members of congress have committed treason by not vetting obama before and after his illegal election.

All 535 have allowed an ILLEGAL ALIEN, who can’t produce a COPY of his hospital generated birth certificate, to produce a pdf document that has been found to be a cut and pasted fake to answer his citizenship status.

All 535 memnbers of congress are also guilty of the CRIMINAL offence of fraud by ALLOWING obama to pass off a doctored document as proof of his US citizenship.

Don’t you think it is beyond strange that NO ONE in congress will question obama’s FAKE “birth certificate”?

A brave woman yelled at the top of her lungs while the US Constitution clause about natural born citizenship was read in Congress. She yelled, “EXCEPT OBAMA”.

She was saying every one in congress was ignoring the US Constitution requirement that obama must be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN! The ONLY voice in congress to question obama’s natural born citizenship status was a lady yelling from the gallery asking 535 members of congress why they are committing FRAUD!) Record Master

Obama was provided cover by congress to hide his true identity

What did Congress know about ‘natural-born citizen’?

From A to Z: What’s wrong with Obama’s birth certificate? Examine for yourself mounting evidence that president’s document isn’t genuine

Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve? WND Complete Archive

America needs just one “ass-backwards” Sherlock Holmes to investigate the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN THE WHITE HOUSE like Lt Columbo, the character played by Perter Falk Instead all America Has In Congress are COWARDS and Traitors

 

The US Constitution doesn’t say if you did not take the oath in public at 12:00 noon you can retake it later with limited public participation at 7:35 or so.

It is the oath of office that gives life and legitimacy to a presidency
The Hoax obama retakes the oath of office but its to late and is not what the US Constitution mandates as required. The US Constitution doesn’t say if you did not take the oath in public at 12:00 noon you can retake it later with limited public participation at 7:35 or so.
…………………………………………………………………………..
Former Rep. James E. Rogan, R-Calif pre-written closing argument statement.

“The mere fact that a person is elected president does not give him the right to become president, no matter how overwhelming his vote margin,” Rogan told the Senate. “Votes alone do not make a person president of the United States. There is a requirement that precedes obtaining the power and authority of obtaining the presidency. It is the oath of office. It is swearing to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. It is accepting the obligation that the laws are to be faithfully executed.

“No oath, no presidency,” he continued. “It is the oath of office that gives life and legitimacy to a presidency.

…………………………………………………………………………..

(Remember what obama said during the oath of office. He couldn’t speak 35 words correctly.

Chief Justice John Roberts, administering the oath for his first time, misspoke the order of a few words.

When roberts reached the phrase, “that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States,” Roberts at first omitted the word “faithfully” – he re-inserted it after “president of the United States.”

Obama paused.

So Roberts repeated the phrase correctly, inserting “faithfully” in the right order: “faithfully execute the office of president of the United States.”

Yet Obama then repeated Roberts’ original misstatement – “the office of president of the United States faithfully.”

So obama did not take the oath correctly as the US Constitution states.

Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Obama said:

“I do solemnly swear, that I will EXECUTE the office of president of the United Staes faithfully, an will ta the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Obama actually said he would EXECUTE the office of the president faithfully.

Obama did not say he would faithfully execute the office of the president.

(Execute al means to put to death, especially by carrying out a lawful sentence.)

My point is obama did not follow the Constitution.

In 1937, the Twentieth Amendment changed the date from March 4 to noon on January 20, beginning with Franklin D. Roosevelt’s second term.

Obama did not take the oath of presidential office correctly at 12 noon.

Chief Justice John Roberts readministered the 35-word oath at 7:35 p.m. Wednesday after flubbing a portion of it on Inauguration Day.

An oath administered incorrectly is not the oath.

“It’s just 35 words, but they have to be said; they have to be said in that order,” said George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley.

Obama said he retook the oath at 7:35pm the same day, but there is NO video of the oath given again. Only a picture.

The US Constitution was not followed because the oath was not correctly spoken by barry soretoro at 12:00 noon as the US Constitution requires.

The US Constituion doesn’t include a wavier for failing to speak an oath incorrectly at later in the day at 7:35 with no public witnesses except 4 reporters, an aid, and a photogropher.

An oath administered incorrectly is not the oath. An oath not administered correctly at 12 noon is also not an oath as the US Constitution requires.

My point again is “No oath, no presidency,”. There in effect was no oath given at 12 noon as the US Constitution requires. A 7:35 retake of the oath of office with out the general public seeing it is also not Constitutional.

America is to believe 5 people are to be enough to validate obama spoke the oath of office correctly.

It doesn’t matter if he did. 7:35pm was to late and obama did not take the oath of office correctly therefore, “No oath, no presidency” is what occurred.

Not only did obama not take the oath of office and become president on Jan 20 he also lied about his US citizenship and to this day cannot produce a COPY of a long form hospital generated birth certificate. He has only produced an ABSTRACT of a document that cannot be validated.

These are TWO major reasons obama is an usurper “president”.) Story Reports
…………………………………………………………………………..

Nordyke numbers expose Obama document fraud. Newly found details about birth registration show president’s certificate out of sequence and why.

Birth certificate procedures revised in 1955 “The attending physician or midwife must report births to the local registrar within seven days after they occur,” they wrote. “If neither was in attendance, a parent or other person must report.”

Family members could report a birth to the Hawaii Department of Health, a practice that n would have allowed Obama’s grandparents to report the birth, even if Obama were not born in Hawaii.

(This is why obama could only produce an ABSTRACT birth certificate and NOT a copy of an original hospital generated long form certificate that could be validated.

Nothing obama has put out can be validated about his US citizenship. Nothing.)

Some people have said Hawaii has validated the hoax birth certificate. Its the “trust me” or the “check’s in the mail” type of validation. Without seeing a COPY of an original document and NOT an ABSTRACT of a document anything Hawaii has “validated” doesn’t mean anything.

Its like buying a pig in a poke.

Obama is a pig in a poke

Obama did not complete the oath of office correctly



……………………………………………………………………………
Vice president cheney is especially guilty of TREASON because he failed to ask for any objections to the electorial votes as required.

3 U.S.C. § 15, Congress is directed to be in session on the appropriate date to count the electoral votes for President, with the President of the Senate presiding. The statute further directs that the electoral votes be counted, and then the results be presented to the President of the Senate, who shall then announce the state of the vote. The statute then provides a mechanism for objections to be registered and resolved.

In 2005 Cheney DID ask for objections. In 2008 Cheny DID NOT follow the law as required.

Members of the 110th congress failed to call for objections to the electorial vote count.

……………………………………………………………………………

LTC LAKIN IS CONVICTED OF TRYING TO EXPOSE THE HOAX OF OBAMA

Lakin guilty on 3 counts

The imposter “president” obama continues to fight the release of valid documentation of his US citizenship.

The only document that has been released by obama is of NO LEGAL VALUE until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative.

This unvalidated document is an amended colb that has been used by state DNC’s and the national DNC to validate obama as qualified to be president.

STATE DNC’s and the national DNC have committed FRAUD and should be investigated and convicted of FRAUD.

All the states relied on the local and national DNC to certify and verify obama as qualifed to be on the DNC ballot.

State prosecuters should call grand juries to indict state DNC officials that certified obama on the 2008 state ballots.

These democratic operatives have committed treason because they have certified the HOAX person calling himself obama.

Federal prosecuters should convene a grand jury to indict nancy pelosi and other DNC members for the FRAUD that has been committed.

LTC Lakin represents all Americans who know obama is a HOAX IMPOSTER president that has NEVER been validated as a US citizen.

If obama was a US citizen he would produce documentation of his American birth that could be verfied by Americans.

If obama was not a HOAX he would not have used millions of dollars to hide his true identity in state and federal courts.

Obama knows his oline colb is not worth the paper it is written on until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative.

The first time a judge or grand jury requires his online colb to be presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person the IMPOSTER knows Probative evidence “seeks the truth” and will require him to provide EVIDNCE of his American citizenship.

LTC Lakin “seeks the truth” and has been convicted of trying to require obama to present evidence of his American citizenship.

The HOAX called obama explained and exposed as an IMPOSTER president

Hawaii Dept Of Health Confirms Democratic National Committee & Hawaii Democratic Party Leadership Did Not Request Obama’s Records

Hawaii Office Of Elections Answer Of How Obama Is Qualifed To Be President

Obama’s online “certification of live birth” is of No legal value and has never been validated by the “democratic” party.

Obama faild to qualify on Jan 20,2008 and is a FRAUD president

This is a KEY fact that any grand jury would use to indict the DNC leaders in each state and national DNC leaders of FRAUD.

The 110th congress that validated the electorial votes can also be investigated for the crime of TREASON. Each and every member that kept silent or voted to admit the electorial votes is GUILITY of FRAUD because the members of congress DID NOT VALIDATE OBAMA’S US CITIZENSHIP.

Vice president cheney is especially guilty of TREASON because he failed to ask for any objections to the electorial votes as required.

*****************************************************************************************
*****************************************************************************************
The DNC never requested any of obama’s records to validate his amended online colb which is of NO LEGAL VALUE until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative.
*****************************************************************************************
*****************************************************************************************

This is why LTC is NOT GUILTY and should be given a medal for trying to expose the HOAX who calls himself obama that has no legal documentation that validates his Ameirican citizenship.

GOD bless you LTC Lakin for representing me and other Americans who know the truth that obama is a FRAUD.

I will be following your case and will not abandon you just because obama has continued to hide the truth of his citizenship.

THE HOAX DETECTOR

The HOAX called obama explained and exposed Pod Cast

S Res 511 (110) Obama Admits He Is An Imposter Pod Cast

The “Fruit Of Selma’s” Hoax SS Number Pod Cast

ObamaRecords.com Nothing From Nothing Leaves Nothing. This describes Obama.

(1) VP Dick Cheney did not follow 3 U.S.C. § 15 and failed to call for objections to be registered and resolved when the electorial votes were counted by the 110th congress.

(2) State and national DNC officals did not verify obama’s US citizenship in the 2008 presidential election and relied only on the online colb released by obama that is of NO LEGAL VALUE until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and they rule the BC to be probative .

(3) Obama was administered the second oath of office in SECRET with no audio or video recording of the oath.