Its Not Hard To Guess What BO Will Do

Monday, July 12, 2010
ITS NOT HARD TO GUESS WHAT OBAMA WILL DO


……………………………………………………………………………

The rise of Hitler mirrors the rise of Obama

The Greater German Reich was the official nazi state name of germany. The German Reich was officially known as the German Empire.

Adolf Hitler, the new Chancellor of Germany, had no intention of abiding by the rules of democracy. He intended only to use those rules to legally establish himself as dictator as quickly as possible then begin the Nazi revolution.

(Barack Obama also has no intention of obeying the rules of the US Constitution. Like hitler obama only will use the rules of the US Constituion to “legally” establish himself as dictator as quickly as possible after the Nov 2008 elections.) Story Reports

Hitler’s plan was to establish a majority of elected Nazis in the Reichstag which would become a rubber stamp, passing whatever laws he desired while making it all perfectly legal.

(This is exactly what happened in Nov 2008. Obama and his fellow democrate “nazi’s” establish a majority in both houses of the US congress, passing whatever laws obama desired while making it all perfectly legal.) Story Reports

On his first day as chancellor hitler attended a dinner with the German General Staff and told them Germany would re-arm as a first step toward regaining its former position in the world. He also gave them a strong hint of things to come by telling them there would be conquest of the lands to the east and ruthless Germanization of conquered territories.

(Obama as president has instructed the joint chiefs of staff and defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to effectively DISARM America. Hitler’s goal was to conquer the world. Obama’s goal is to let the MUSLIM world conquer America!) Story Reports

Hitler also reassured the generals there would be no attempt to replace the regular army with an army of SA storm troopers. For years this had been a big concern of the generals who wanted to preserve their own positions of power and keep the traditional military intact.

(Obama has included a private army of civilians in the obamacare bill. The Commissioned Corps (CC) and the Ready Reserve Corps (RRC).) Story Reports

Why two separate corps and what the differences are are not clear, other than that the officers of the RRC are appointed solely by the President. In effect, the RRC would be like Hitler’s SS.

(What does this mean? Does “without regard to civil-service laws” mean that appointees do not have to meet criteria of civil service appointments, such as those of education, training, qualification, and FBI clearance? Does compensation “without regard to the Classification Act of 1923″ mean that Obama can bypass Congressional approval of funding?)

The relevant section begins on page 1312 of the Senate ObamaCare bill that was approved by the Demonrats in the House of Representatives.

SEC. 430. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS.

Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204) is amended to read as follows:

SEC. 203. COMMISSIONED CORPS AND READY RESERVE CORPS.

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.­

(1) IN GENERAL.­ There shall be in the Service a commissioned Regular Corps and a Ready Reserve Corps for service in time of national emergency.

(2) REQUIREMENT.­ All commissioned officers shall be citizens of the United States and shall be appointed without regard to the civil-service laws and compensated without regard to the Classification Act of 1923, as amended.

(3) APPOINTMENT.­ Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall be appointed by the President and commissioned officers of the Regular Corps shall be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(4) ACTIVE DUTY.­ Commissioned officers of the Ready Reserve Corps shall at all times be subject to call to active duty by the Surgeon General, including active duty for the purpose of training.

(5) WARRANT OFFICERS.­ Warrant officers may be appointed to the Service for the purpose of providing support to the health and delivery systems maintained by the Service and any warrant officer appointed to the Service shall be considered for purposes of this Act and title 37, United States Code, to be a commissioned officer within the Commissioned Corps of the Service.

(b) ASSIMILATING RESERVE CORP OFFICERS INTO THE REGULAR CORPS. Effective on the date of enactment of the Affordable Health Choices Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.

(c) PURPOSE AND USE OF READY RESERVE.­

(1) PURPOSE.­ The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service’s reserve program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions.

(2) USES.­The Ready Reserve Corps shall­

(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;

(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;

(C) be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and

(D) be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and medically underserved communities (as defined in section 399SS) to improve access to health services.

(d) FUNDING.­ For the purpose of carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to the Office of the Surgeon General for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014. Funds appropriated under this subsection shall be used for recruitment and training of Commissioned Corps Officers.

Göring as Minister of the Interior for Prussia took control of the police.

Göring immediately replaced hundreds of police officials loyal to the republic with Nazi officials loyal to Hitler. He also ordered the police not to interfere with the SA and SS under any circumstances. This meant that anybody being harassed, beaten, or even murdered by Nazis, had nobody to turn to for help.

Göring then ordered the police to show no mercy to those deemed hostile to the State, meaning those hostile to Hitler, especially Communists.

(Obama could issue an executive order or one of his cabinet members could issue and order to obama civilian military force, the Commissioned Corps (CC) and the Ready Reserve Corps (RRC) to show no mercy to those obama deemed hostile to the state. The ready reserve corps is appointed by obama, his SS. Obama will be forced to implement this different than hitler did because Americans love their liberty and will fight for their freedoms. Obama has miscalculated.) Story Reports

“Police officers who use weapons in carrying out their duties will be covered by me. Whoever misguidedly fails in this duty can expect disciplinary action.” – Order of Hermann Göring to Prussian Police, February 1933.

On February 22, 1933 Göring set up an auxiliary police force of 50,000 men, composed mostly of members of the SA and SS. The vulgar, brawling, murderous Nazi storm troopers now had the power of police.

Two days later, they raided Communist headquarters in Berlin. Göring falsely claimed he had uncovered plans for a Communist uprising in the raid. But he actually uncovered the membership list of the Communist party and intended to arrest every one of the four thousand members.

(Hitler created a fake CRISIS to seize total power and become DICTATOR! Obama will also create another FAKE CRISIS before or just after the Nov 2010 elections to seize power.) Story Reports

Göring and Goebbels, with Hitler’s approval, then hatched a plan to cause panic by burning the Reichstag building and blaming the Communists. The Reichstag was the building in Berlin where the elected members of the republic met to conduct the daily business of government.

…………………………………………………………………………….
(This is the reichstag “crisis”. Obama will also create a fake reichstag crisis before or after Nov 2010. It most likely will be in the form of an attack on American soil by his muslim brothers that support obama. Right wing radical extremists will be blamed for the attack. Obama has opened the door wide open to an attack by his muslim brothers to help him seize power and become a muslim dictator. After the manufactured crisis has occurred obama’s SS will be composed of many of his fellow muslim and left wing radical extremist brothers in the form of the Commissioned Corps (CC) and the Ready Reserve Corps (RRC) to show no mercy to those obama deemed hostile to the state. SEC. 430. ESTABLISHING A READY RESERVE CORPS. in obamacare bill.) Story Reports

…………………………………………………………………………….
By a weird coincidence, there was also in Berlin a deranged Communist conducting a one-man uprising. An arsonist named Marinus van der Lubbe, 24, from Holland, had been wandering around Berlin for a week attempting to burn government buildings to protest capitalism and start a revolt. On February 27, he decided to burn the Reichstag building.

Carrying incendiary devices, he spent all day lurking around the building, before breaking in around 9 p.m. He took off his shirt, lit it on fire, then went to work using it as his torch.

The exact sequence of events will never be known, but Nazi storm troopers under the direction of Göring were also involved in torching the place. They had befriended the arsonist and may have known or even encouraged him to burn the Reichstag that night. The storm troopers, led by SA leader Karl Ernst, used the underground tunnel that connected Göring’s residence with the cellar in the Reichstag. They entered the building, scattered gasoline and incendiaries, then hurried back through the tunnel.

The deep red glow of the burning Reichstag caught the eye of President Hindenburg and Vice-Chancellor Papen who were dining at a club facing the building. Papen put the elderly Hindenburg in his own car and took him to the scene.

Hitler was at Goebbels’ apartment having dinner. They rushed to the scene where they met Göring who was already screaming false charges and making threats against the Communists.

At first glance, Hitler described the fire as a beacon from heaven.

(Hitler should have said it was a beacon from hell and a sign from his comrades.) Story Reports

“You are now witnessing the beginning of a great epoch in German history…This fire is the beginning,” Hitler told a news reporter at the scene.

After viewing the damage, an emergency meeting of government leaders was held. When told of the arrest of the Communist arsonist, Van der Lubbe, Hitler became deliberately enraged.

“The German people have been soft too long. Every Communist official must be shot. All Communist deputies must be hanged this very night. All friends of the Communists must be locked up. And that goes for the Social Democrats and the Reichsbanner as well!”

Hitler left the fire scene and went straight to the offices of his newspaper, the Völkischer Beobachter, to oversee its coverage of the fire. He stayed up all night with Goebbels putting together a paper full of tales of a Communist plot to violently seize power in Berlin.

At a cabinet meeting held later in the morning, February 28, Chancellor Hitler demanded an emergency decree to overcome the crisis. He met little resistance from his largely non-Nazi cabinet. That evening, Hitler and Papen went to Hindenburg and the befuddled old man signed the decree “for the Protection of the people and the State.”

(This was a manufactured crisis conceived to make false charges and threats against all those who opposed hitler. This is EXACTLY what will happen just before or after the Nov 2010 elections. Obama will sign an “emergency decree”, ie an executive order “, for the Protection of the people and the State.” Obama and his fellow traitors will conceive a manufactured crisis, execute it and hold a news conference to explain the manufacutred crisis to America.) Story Reports

The Emergency Decree stated: “Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press; on the rights of assembly and association; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.”

(Previous executive orders are in place to suspend the US Constitution for 6 months without review from congress by the stroke of a pen during a manufactured crisis!) Story Reports

Immediately, there followed the first big Nazi roundup as truckloads of SA and SS roared through the streets bursting in on known Communist hangouts and barging into private homes. Thousands of Communists as well as Social Democrats and liberals were taken away into ‘protective custody’ to SA barracks where they were beaten and tortured.

(The commissioned officers of the Regular Reserve Corps appointed solely by the President, and those of the Commissioned Corps appointed by the President will be used to enforce martial law. This is obama’s GESTAPO. All commissioned officers will be appointed without regard to civil-service laws, their compensation without regard to the Classification Act of 1923. These people will be used in the nar future to take Americans into ‘protective custody’ along with those in the regular military who are willing to obey the dictator obama. Also the UN has placed foreign troops on US soil who will also inforce MARTIAL LAW. Americans will rebel and defend themselves against the dictatorship of obama. Another civil war will ensue.) Story Reports

Nazi newspapers continued to print false evidence of Communist conspiracies, claiming that only Hitler and the Nazis could prevent a Communist takeover. Joseph Goebbels now had control of the State-run radio and broadcast Nazi propaganda and Hitler’s speeches all across the nation.

(After obama shuts down the internet the “state run media” will be totally controlled to tell Americans FALSE LIES of conspiracies claiming that only obama and his administration could prevent a right wing extremist takeover or a combination of right wing extremists and an unknown foreign/domestic threat. Joseph Goebbels, or whoever the mouth piece for obama is, will control the State-run radio and broadcasts of obama propaganda and obama’s speeches all across the nation.) Story Reports

The Nazis now turned their attention to election day, March 5, 1933.

All of the resources of the government necessary for a big win were placed at the disposal of Joseph Goebbels. The big industrialists who had helped Hitler into power gladly coughed up three million marks. Representatives from Krupp munitions and I. G. Farben were among those reaching into their pockets at Göring’s insistence.

(It sound incredible but a manufacutred crisis just 2 months before obama was elected in 2008 allowed obama to assume power as president. A manufactured crisis again will allow a suspended or delayed election to occur by using an obama executive order during a “national crisis”. George soros a big industrialist will insure democrates stay in power. Obama will be dictator for life!) Story Reports

“The sacrifice we ask is easier to bear if you realize that the elections will certainly be the last for the next ten years, probably for the next hundred years,” Göring told them.

With no money problems and the power of the State behind them, the Nazis campaigned furiously to get Hitler the majority he wanted.

On March 5, the last free elections were held. But the people denied Hitler his majority, giving the Nazis only 44 per cent of the total vote, 17, 277,180. Despite massive propaganda and the brutal crackdown, the other parties held their own. The Center Party got over four million and the Social Democrats over seven million. The Communists lost votes but still got over four million.

The goal of a legally established dictatorship was now within reach. But the lack of the necessary two thirds majority in the Reichstag was an obstacle. For Hitler and his ruthless inner circle, it was obstacle that was soon to be overcome.

As for Van der Lubbe, the Communist arsonist, he was tried and convicted, then beheaded.

…………………………………………………………………………….
READ HOW HISTORY WILL REPEAT ITSELF JUST BEFORE OR AFTER THE NOV 2010 ELECTIONS
…………………………………………………………………………….
Hitler becomes dictator

After the elections of March 5, 1933, the Nazis began a systematic takeover of the state governments throughout Germany, ending a centuries old tradition of local political independence. Armed SA and SS thugs barged into local government offices using the state of emergency decree as a pretext to throw out legitimate office holders and replace them with Nazi Reich commissioners.

Political enemies were arrested by the thousands and put in hastily constructed holding pens. Old army barracks and abandoned factories were used as prisons. Once inside, prisoners were subjected to military style drills and harsh discipline. They were often beaten and sometimes even tortured to death. This was the very beginning of the Nazi concentration camp system.

At this time, these early concentration camps were loosely organized under the control of the SA and the rival SS. Many were little more than barbed wire stockades know as ‘wild’ concentration camps, set up by local Gauleiters and SA leaders.

For Adolf Hitler, the goal of a legally established dictatorship was now within reach. On March 15, 1933, a cabinet meeting was held during which Hitler and Göring discussed how to obstruct what was left of the democratic process to get an Enabling Act passed by the Reichstag. This law would hand over the constitutional functions of the Reichstag to Hitler, including the power to make laws, control the budget and approve treaties with foreign governments.

(This is what obama is doing. “Legally establishing a dictatorship.”) (Story Reports)

The emergency decree signed by Hindenburg on February 28, after the Reichstag fire, made it easy for them to interfere with non-Nazi elected representatives of the people by simply arresting them.

As Hitler plotted to bring democracy to an end in Germany, Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels put together a brilliant public relations display at the official opening of the newly elected Reichstag.

On March 21, in the Garrison Church at Potsdam, the burial place of Frederick the Great, an elaborate ceremony took place designed to ease public concern over Hitler and his gangster-like new regime.

(This is what occurs daily with the “state run media.” The national media eases concern over obama and his gangster-like new regime by not reporting the details of his agenda.) Story Reports

It was attended by President Hindenburg, foreign diplomats, the General Staff and all the old guard going back to the days of the Kaiser. Dressed in their handsome uniforms sprinkled with medals, they watched a most reverent Adolf Hitler give a speech paying respect to Hindenburg and celebrating the union of old Prussian military traditions and the new Nazi Reich. As a symbol of this, the old Imperial flags would soon add swastikas.

Finishing his speech, Hitler walked over to Hindenburg and respectfully bowed before him while taking hold of the old man’s hand. The scene was recorded on film and by press photographers from around the world. This was precisely the impression Hitler and Goebbels wanted to give to the world, all the while plotting to toss aside Hindenburg and the elected Reichstag.

Later that same day, Hindenburg signed two decrees put before him by Hitler. The first offered full pardons to all Nazis currently in prison. The prison doors sprang open and out came an assortment of Nazi thugs and murderers.

(Obama, I believe will sign an executive order to free illegal aliens from prison and declare all illegal aliens as American citizens. This will cause further chaos and create another manufactured crisis for obama not to waste!) Story Reports

The second decree signed by the befuddled old man allowed for the arrest of anyone suspected of maliciously criticizing the government and the Nazi party.

(Obama has laid the ground work for this to happen to Americans. INTERPOL and “homeland security” will help ensure right wing radical extremists will be controlled. Any opposing opposition will be branded as maliciously criticizing the government and the “democratic” party. This as I have said will cause a civil war and continuous chaos insuring the need for continuous MARTIAL LAW and the suspension of the US Constitution!) Story Reports

A third decree signed only by Hitler and Papen allowed for the establishment of special courts to try political offenders. These courts were conducted in the military style of a court-martial without a jury and usually with no counsel for the defense.

On March 23, the newly elected Reichstag met in the Kroll Opera House in Berlin to consider passing Hitler’s Enabling Act. It was officially called the “Law for Removing the Distress of the People and the Reich.” If passed, it would in effect vote democracy out of existence in Germany and establish the legal dictatorship of Adolf Hitler.

(Notice how hitler’s fake law, “Law for Removing the Distress of the People and the Reich”, mirrors the strange, vague, twisted, convoluted and contrived names the democrates have given to their laws, to CONFUSE and hide the true meaning of obama’s “contrived laws”.) Story Reports

Brown-shirted Nazi storm troopers swarmed over the fancy old building in a show of force and as a visible threat. They stood outside, in the hallways and even lined the aisles inside, glaring ominously at anyone who might oppose Hitler’s will.

(Obama’s private army of civilians in the obamacare bill, The Commissioned Corps (CC) and the Ready Reserve Corps (RRC) can and will be used as a show of force and a visible threat just like Hitler used his brown-shirted Nazi storm troopers.) Story Reports

Before the vote, Hitler made a speech in which he pledged to use restraint.

“The government will make use of these powers only insofar as they are essential for carrying out vitally necessary measures…The number of cases in which an internal necessity exists for having recourse to such a law is in itself a limited one,” Hitler told the Reichstag.

He also promised an end to unemployment and pledged to promote peace with France, Great Britain and the Soviet Union. But in order to do all this, Hitler said, he first needed the Enabling Act. A two-thirds majority was needed, since the law would actually alter the constitution. Hitler needed 31 non-Nazi votes to pass it. He got those votes from the Catholic Center Party after making a false promise to restore some basic rights already taken away by decree.

(This sounds just like obama and how he bought off votes in congress though intimidation and false promises to force laws though his majority congress that the majority of the American people did not want. Obama and the democrate majority ignored America after his election. A precursor to his establishment as permanent dictator!) Story Reports

Meanwhile, Nazi storm troopers chanted outside: “Full powers – or else! We want the bill – or fire and murder!!”

But one man arose amid the overwhelming might. Otto Wells, leader of the Social Democrats stood up and spoke quietly to Hitler.

“We German Social Democrats pledge ourselves solemnly in this historic hour to the principles of humanity and justice, of freedom and socialism. No enabling act can give you power to destroy ideas which are eternal and indestructible.”

Hitler was enraged and jumped up to respond.

“You are no longer needed! – The star of Germany will rise and yours will sink! Your death knell has sounded!”

The vote was taken – 441 for, and only 84, the Social Democrats, against. The Nazis leapt to their feet clapping, stamping and shouting, then broke into the Nazi anthem, the Hörst Wessel song.

Democracy was ended. They had brought down the German Democratic Republic legally. From this day onward, the Reichstag would be just a sounding board, a cheering section for Hitler’s pronouncements.

(This is similar to what happened when the joint session of congress met in Nov 2008 to count the electorial votes. Pelosi clapped like a crazed devil along with the thunderous applause of the entire joint session. No objections to obama’s qualifications as president. No one questioned his citizenship. It was like congress told the American people YOU ARE NO LONGER NEEDED! Remember?) Story Reports

Interestingly, the Nazi party was now flooded with applications for membership. These latecomers were cynically labeled by old time Nazis as ‘March Violets.’ In May, the Nazi Party froze membership. Many of those kept out applied to the SA and the SS which were still accepting. However, in early 1934, Heinrich Himmler would throw out 50,000 of those ‘March Violets’ from the SS.

(People needed jobs. Many would join the Nazi party to obtain a job. Many would join because they wanted to be seen as supporters of the party in power. Many were afraid of hitler and what he could and would do to them. There are many ‘March Violets in America. There people are who are willing to sellout to obama for gain alone. These are composed of obama supporters and others willing to sell their soul. These people are the duped and the deceivers that will become the GESTAPO types that will try to keep obama in power.) Story Reports

The Nazi Gleichschaltung now began, a massive coordination of all aspects of life under the swastika and the absolute leadership of Adolf Hitler.

Under Hitler, the State, not the individual, was supreme.

(Under obama, the State, not the individual, is supreme.)

(This is what obamacare and the other “laws’ obama will enfore will do to Americans. Obamacare is a massive coordination of all aspects of life under the liberal swastika of obama and the absolute leadership of obama and the democratic party!) Story Reports

From the moment of birth one existed to serve the State and obey the dictates of the Führer. Those who disagreed were disposed of.

Many agreed. Bureaucrats, industrialists, even intellectual and literary figures, including Gerhart Hauptmann, world renowned dramatist, were coming out in open support of Hitler.

Many disagreed and left the country. A flood of the finest minds, including over two thousand writers, scientists, and people in the arts poured out of Germany and enriched other lands, mostly the United States. Among them – writer Thomas Mann, director Fritz Lang, actress Marlene Dietrich, architect Walter Gropius, musicians Otto Klemperer, Kurt Weill, Richard Tauber, psychologist Sigmund Freud, and Albert Einstein, who was visiting California when Hitler came to power and never returned to Germany.

In Germany, there were now constant Nazi rallies, parades, marches and meetings amid the relentless propaganda of Goebbels and the omnipresent swastika. For those who remained there was an odd mixture of fear and optimism in the air.

(CONTRAST THIS WITH WHAT YOU SEE AND HEAR TODAY. CONSTANT OBAMA SPEECHES AND MEETINGS amid the relentless propaganda of “THE STATE RUN MEDIA’ and the omnipresent swastika, OR PICTURE OF OBAMA’S IMAGE EVERYWHERE IN THE MEDIA. TODAY AS IN 1934 THERE IS AN ODD MIXTURE OF FEAR AND SIMI OPTIMISM IN THE AIR. The simi optimism as reported by the “state run media” and the FEAR as reported on the internet through various blogs and news services.) Story Reports

Now, for the first time as dictator, Adolf Hitler turned his attention to the driving force which had propelled him into politics in the first place, his hatred of the Jews. It began with a simple boycott on April 1, 1933, and would end years later in the greatest tragedy in all of human history.
…………………………………………………………………………….
(ITS NOT HARD TO GUESS WHAT OBAMA WILL DO. OBAMA HAS A DRIVING HATRED FOR AMERICA. OBAMA HAS A DRIVING HATRED FOR WHITE AMERICANS ALSO. UNLIKE THE UNARMED JEWS IN GERMANY WHITE AMERICANS WILL DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST EXTERMINATION AS WILL OTHERS.) STORY REPORTS
…………………………………………………………………………….

Private obama army included in obamacare bill

The Reichstag Burns

The rise of hitler as dictator

OBAMA MIRRORS THE HISTORY OF HITLER’S RISE TO POWER AS DICTATOR. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS READ HISTORY TO SEE OBAMA IS IMPLEMENTING HITLERS RISE TO POWER TEMPLATE. JUST COMPARE WHAT HITLER DID TO WHAT OBAMA IS DOING THEN THINK ABOUT THE SIMILAR OR EXACT SAME AGENDA OF BOTH HITLER AND OBAMA.

Obama Has Always Been An Illegal Alien And Still Is

Obama’s mother Stanley Ann Dunham was born Nov 29, 1942 as her application for a social security number shows.

Obama was born on Aug 4, 1961 as his undocumented “certification of live birth” shows.

Obama was born 18 years 8 months after his mother was born.

Obama’s “American citizen parent”, Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.

I have been stating the fact that a naural born citizen of the US must have been born to parents who were both citizens at the time of birth, which is correct. Obama is not a natural born citizen because of this fact.

I have over looked the fact that Staley Ann Dunham was 18 years 8 months old at the time of obama’s “birth”. Obama is an illegal alien because of this fact.

Obama says he was citizen of Kenya and a British subject at birth.

Obama was not an American citizen at birth because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.

So what was he and what is he now?

Did his Kenyan citizenship expire at age 21?

The Kenyan Constitution prohibits dual citizenship for adults. Kenya recognizes dual citizenship for children, but Kenya’s Constitution specifies that at age 23, Kenyan citizens who possesses citizenship in more than one country automatically lose their Kenyan citizenship unless they formally renounce any non-Kenyan citizenship and swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1984.

The fact is obama was never a US citizen because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.

Obama was never a dual citizen.

If obama didn’t swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya he is not a Kenyan citizen either.

So what is the citizship status of obama?

It would seem from all the evidence obama is just an ILLEGAL alien.

At birth he was just a citizen of Kenya but that expired at age 21.

All this talk about natural born citizenship is for nothing if obama’s mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.

In 1866, Senator
Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by stating:

“Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.”

This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:

“[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word…”

The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child. Thus, the completeness of their allegiance to the United States is impaired, which therefore precludes automatic citizenship.

Obama’s allegiance to the United States was not complete at the time of his birth as he states on his website because he was a citizen of Kenya.

Was obama an illegal alien at birth because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952.

It would seem so. Also obama’s automatic citizenship because of the 14th Amendment is in doubt because his allegiance at birth was to Kenya.

Obama, Jr. then automatically became a citizen of Kenya when the independent nation was formed (from what had been Zanzibar) in 1963 because his father was a citizen of the British East African Protectorate of Zanzibar at the time of obama’s birth.

Although it is complicated to understand it can be stated obama was an illegal alien at birth because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952, for obama to become a US citizen therefore obama was just a British citizen at birth because his father was a citizen of the British East African Protectorate of Zanzibar.

Obama was and is an illegal alien.

Obama as far as we know did not swear an oath of allegiance to Kenya, therfore he is no longer a Kenyan citizen.

Obama is not only a big no record he is in fact a “MAN WITHOUT A COUNTRY!”

“The Man Without a Country” was a short story about American army lieutenant Philip Nolan, who renounces his country during a trial for treason.

The “man without a country” I am talking about here has none because his temporary Kenyan citizenship expired at age 21 unless he swore an oath of allegiance to Kenya in secret and is now a Kenyan citizen.

One thing for sure is, because his mother did not meet the requirement of the nationality act of 1940 revised jun 1952 at the time of obama’s birth obama is not now and was never an American citizen! Obama’s allegiance to the United States was not complete at the time of his birth as he states on his website because he was a citizen of Kenya. Obama’s automatic citizenship because of the 14th Amendment is also in doubt because his allegiance at birth was to Kenya.

The birth certificate issue as I stated before is just a side show. Now I also realize the natural born citizenship status of obama is also a side show.

The “main attraction” is the fact obama was never an American citizen. Obama has only been a british subject then a Kenyan citizen until age 21.

The main attraction is the fact obama is now an ILLEGAL alien.

If any amnesty law is passed obama will, as an illegal alien, be given a US citizenship.

But what good is an amnesty law signed by an ILLEGAL ALIEN?

The obama timeline exposes obama as an illegal alien!

……………………………………………………………………………..

Kenyan Birth Allegations And Facts About The FRAUD Obama

Obama’s American citizen parent, Ann Dunham, had to have been a resident of the United States for 10 years, at least five of which were over the age of 14. Dunham did not meet that requirement (of the Nationality Act of 1940, revised June, 1952) until her 19th birthday in late November of 1961, almost four months after Obama was born.

The law confers U.S. nationality on the infant of a foreign father only under certain circumstances; it would apply to a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States, who prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years.”

Obama’s mother didn’t qualify obama to be a US citizen. Obama was the infant of a foreign father. This is the key. His mother had to be physically present in the US 5 years after the age of fourteen. She missed it by 4 months. Obama missed it by 4 months. Obama is an illegal alien. Its very obvious.

 

Obama is in fact an illegal alien

I have an example of an obama supporter, a “natural”, who presents a flawed argument about obama and his natural born citizenship status. Obama “naturals” as I call them are obsessed with the fact that anyone would dare question if obama is a natural born citizen. The “naturals” defend obama with newspaper and statements made by other obama supporters as documented evidence obama is a natural born citizen and has a real birth certificate. I’ll admit obama is a natural liar and can deceive the weak minded and uninformed.

The “natural” obama supporter stated:

Dual nationality has no effect on Natural Born Citizen status. That is why the Chief Justice of the United States swore him in, and why Obama’s election was confirmed by the US Congress UNANIMOUSLY.

Obama has proven that he was born in Hawaii with the official birth certificate of Hawaii. The Wall Street Journal said: ““Obama has already provided a legal birth certificate demonstrating that he was born in Hawaii. No one has produced any serious evidence to the contrary. Absent such evidence, it is unreasonable to deny that Obama has met the burden of proof. We know that he was born in Honolulu as surely as we know that Bill Clinton was born in Hope, Ark., or George W. Bush in New Haven, Conn.”

Since no controlling legal authority sought to validate Bush’s birth or Clinton’s or JFK’s or any president’s, that is why there was none for Obama either.

The natural says, “No one has produced any serious evidence to the contrary.”

Here is the evidence right out of obama’s own mouth or S. RES. 511 April 30, 2008

“Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936:”

In the senate resolution quote that barack obama signed, it is damming evidence obama declares that a natural born citizen is a US citizen
at the time of birth because both parents are US citizens.

Obama agreed and cosponsored this senate resolution that Mccain was a natural born citizen at birth because his parents were US citizens at the time of Mccain’s birth.

Obama also declares on his fight the smears website that he was a Kenyan citizen until age 21 because his father was a Kenyan citizen at his birth.

Obama admits he was a dual citizen at birth. One prarent was American and one parent was Kenyan at his birth therefore he is declaring on his fight the smears website that he is not a natural born citizen because both his parents were not US citizens as Mccains were at the time of his birth.

This is damming evidence that obama admits he is a FRAUD.

Again obama affirms what a natural born citizen is. A citizen born of parents who are US citizens at the time of birth.

Again obama admits he was a dual citizen at birth and not a natural born citizen.

If a “natural” confronts you with something similar to the above statement of “facts” from newspapers please refer them to barack obama’s own admission in his senate resolution S511 where he has defined what he considers to be a natural born citizen.

Senate Resolution 511

Obama admits he was a dual citizen at birth

The Natural

The Natural

The Imposter Obama’s Acknowledgement Of FRAUD

SRES 511 ATS (Senate Resolution)

110th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. RES. 511

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 10, 2008

Mrs. MCCASKILL (for herself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. COBURN, Mrs. CLINTON, and Mr. WEBB) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

April 24, 2008

Reported by Mr. LEAHY, without amendment

April 30, 2008

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=sr110-511

Mr. OBAMA, submitted the S. RES. 511. Senator Obama cosponsored the resolution. Senator Obama Signed S. RES. 511.

Senator Obama Has Defined What A Natural Born Citizen Is.

Senator Obama says: “John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens”.

Obama has declared Mccain is a natural born citizen because
Joh Mccain’s parents were citizens of the US at the time of Mccain’s birth.

This is documented evidence of Obama’s definition of a natural born citizen.

This is what Obama believes the US Constitution means when it refers to a natural born citizen.

The natural born citizen phrase in the US Constitution only applies to anyone seeking to become president of the US.

The natural born citizen phrase applies to Obama and everyone else seeking the office of President of the US.

Obama was born to one US citizen at birth, his mother. His father at his birth was a Kenyan citizen or British subject.

The day obama entered the first US presidential primary the DNC stated in all 50 US states that obama was Constitutionality eligible to seek the office of President of the US.

Obama and the DNC committed FRAUD as evidenced by his own cosponsored senate resolution 511, which stated a natural born citizen is a citizen that is born to American citizens at birth.

The senate resolution didn’t say citizen but said citizens plural.

Senate resolution 511 is solid evidence of who obama deems to be a natural born citizen. It is also solid evidence of Obama’s interpretation of the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

This is clear and exact evidence of the FRAUD Obama has commited by declaring himself to be eligible to be President of the US.

Now there can be no doubt obama is a FRAUD. A FRAUD who declared who he believed a natural born citizen was.

He declared Mccain was a natural born citizen because he was born of parents who were US citizens at the time of Mccains birth.

Obama also declared before the presidential contest that he was a citizen of Kenya until age 21 because his father was a Kenyan citizen at his birth. Obama also declared his mother was a US citizen at his birth.

Only one of Obama’s parents was a US citizen at his birth but obama declared through S. RES. 511 his opinion of what a natural born citizen is and that both parents must be US citizens at birth to be a natural born citizen of the US.

Obama has committed FRAUD for this reason.

Every moment Obama is in the office as US president he is commiting FRAUD. Every statment he makes as President he is committing FRAUD. Every document he signs as President he is committing FRAUD.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=sr110-511

Read the senate resolution obama cosponsored and signed for yourself and realize obama is a total FRAUD.

http://storyreportscomments.blogspot.com/2010/04/barry-soetoro-aka-barack-obama-exposed.html

 
Leo Punts

Leo Punts

Leo Donofrio is ‘PUNTING” the ‘BALL’ and says quote, “The blog is taking too much of my time and energy.” If this is true Leo has wasted my time as others. I have followed Leo on his blog and was inspired by him to believe obama could be exposed as a FRAUD through Quo Qarranto. Leo explained the process and documented how it could be done. Now Leo has removed all his documented information and left us all ‘out to dry’. One day Leo exclaims he will not give up and the next he says he does not have enough time all of a sudden. I have documented some of Leo’s outstanding work about Quo Warranto. I thought it was worthy of documenting and trying to disseminate. I can’t believe Leo is giving up. He did this once before and later starting informing us again. Leo don’t give up and don’t let us down!
……………………………………………………………………………….

Quo Warranto For “Interested Persons”.

The information Leo posted on Oct 8, 2009 explains how Americans can expose obama as a FRAUD. This post is important to all who want to know how to expose obama as an imposter. Leo is correct I believe. This will work. I can’t understand why Leo did not bring this action in the DC Court or represent someone who was directly injured by obama such as Sarah Palin or Geral Walpin.

Leo has deleted this information from his blog but it is still cached by google.
Quo Warranto For Interested Persons
……………………………………………………………………………….

Section 16-3503 of the federal quo warranto statute allows an “interested person” to approach the DC District Court concerning a quo warranto trial (by jury) without requiring the permission of the US Attorney General or the US Attorney for DC.

An “interested person” may sign a “certified complaint” which states facts and those facts must be sworn to under penalty of perjury. Only facts may be sworn to, not allegations. The “interested person” gathers up all facts known to him/her and puts them in the petition, swears to them under oath and hands that in to the Court. Pretty simple, folks.

One fact which could safely be sworn to is that Obama was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 and that he was – at birth – a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies. These are facts admitted by Obama. These facts have never been laid before the DC District Court. These facts are not in the complaint before Judge Carter. Why not?

16-3503 states:

If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person…

Plaintiffs in Barnett v. Obama allege that they have standing which is unique and special compared to the public at large. Therefore, they should have availed themselves of 16-3503.

But they’ve never even tried.

Plaintiffs have only attempted to avail themselves of 16-3502. All citizens are considered “third persons” under 16-3502, but all citizens don’t have unique standing and therefore 16-3502 requires permission by the Department of Justice to use the name of the US – ex relator – ina quo warranto proceeding.

But if you are an “interested person” under 16-3503 – aka a person with unique standing – then you do not need permission from the Department of Justice for the quo warranto.

The DC District Court examines the certified petition prior to allowing the suit to go forth based upon that petition. If the court is satisfied that the person issuing the petition is an “interested person” then that person is not needed any longer for the trial.

Once the name of the United States is allowed to be used, the “interested person” may step off, and the facts alleged are to be tried independently. For example, facts concerning what makes the President ineligible have nothing to do with the particular plaintiffs in Barnett v. Obama. So there’s no need for them to travel across the country for the trial. The trial is brought against the alleged usurper in the name of the United States.

There’s nothing stopping the plaintiffs from petitioning the DC District Court right now based upon facts known and verifiable as to the President’s British birth.

Why has this option been ignored? 16-3503 provides an excellent chance for review of these facts. There it is. Why not use it? A golden opportunity is being thrown by the way side.

Either the DC District Court will agree that these military persons are “interested persons” or it will not. Either the DC District Court will agree that 2008 Presidential candidate Alan Keyes is an “interested person” or it will not.

If the DC District Court does not agree that these plaintiffs are “interested persons” under the statute, then plaintiffs can make the same arguments they are making now before Judge Carter.

I don’t see any tactical advantage at all in avoiding the DC District Court.

Why give one of your tickets away for free? Why give away your best ticket for free? Why not avail yourself of the very statute created by Congress to review the eligibility of all US national office holders?

Doing so also avoids “political question doctrine” issues because the quo warranto statute is a congressional exercise of Constitutional authority to review the President’s eligibility. Why not kill two birds with one stone? Also, all arguments that a quo warranto action is too late now that he’s been sworn in are just patently bogus.

Quo warranto can only be invoked against somebody holding an office under false title.

Quo warranto only applies to actual usurpation not possible usurpation. It is the legislature’s sole enactment which allows judicial review of the President’s eligibility. And it appears that serious attempts are being made to avoid it. Before going off point and trying to force this issue upon courts which have not been given such authority, an action should have been brought – and still can be – under 16-3503.

Look people, I’m trying to help. Read this over a few times until it sinks in.
……………………………………………………………………………..

Leo I read this over a few times. I agree. Why have you deserted America and punted? Story Reports
……………………………………………………………………………..

THE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO

Leo has deleted this information but I have preserved it for your information and mine.

Leo is the citizen lawyer that has inspired me and others to believe the system can still work if applied correctly. Leo has prsented enough information for any US citizen or other interested person to explore the option of using Quo Warranto to expose the FRAUD obama. I wish I knew if any other lawyer or interested party has attempted to use Quo Warranto to expose the IMPOSTER obama. I believe this is possible. Of course I don’t know how the DC Court would respond.

I appeal again to Leo Donofrio to file a Quo Warranto in Dc Court before giving up on America and all those who believe in the possiblity of removing obama from office because of Quo Warranto.Story Reports

THE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO

A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.

Chapter 35 SUBCHAPTER I
ACTIONS AGAINST OFFICERS OF THE UNITED STATES

Actions Against Officers Of The United States QUO WARRANTO Chaper 35 Sub Chapter I

Chapter 35 SUBCHAPTER II
ACTIONS AGAINST OFFICERS OR CORPORATIONS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Actions Against Officers Or Corporations Of The District Of Columbia

Chapter 35 SUBCHAPTER III
PROCEDURES AND JUDGMENTS

Procedures And Judgments

………………………………………………………………………………

Constitution.org Quo Warranto

§ 4.19 STANDING — PRIVATE PERSONS SUING IN OWN NAME UNDER STATUTES PERMITTING WITH LEAVE OF COURT

It is now fairly common for states by statute or court rule to allow private individuals, under certain circumstances at least, to bring actions in quo warranto (or its modern equivalent) with leave granted by court.’

Frequently by statute or rule the individual seeking leave must be an “interested person.”

Other courts have often said that “a person who has no greater interest than the public generally cannot maintain an action….”4 Generally claimants to the public office involved have been accepted as “interested persons,”5 and there has been expressed at times the unfortunate notion that only such claimants are “specially interested.”6

Statutes authorizing private persons to bring quo warranto in their own names customarily require them to post security for costs.17

§ 4.21 STANDING – PRIVATE PERSONS BRINGING IN OWN NAME UNDER STATUTES AUTHORIZING SAME AFTER ATTORNEY GENERAL HAS REFUSED TO BRING ACTION

Statutes and rules of court in a number of jurisdictions permit private individuals to bring quo warranto, either in their own name or in the name of the state, after they have requested the attorney general to commence such action and he has refused.l

Notwithstanding the unqualified language of the statutes, e.g. “a private person,” “any citizen,” “any elector”, courts operating under these statutes have been inclined to rule that persons generally cannot bring quo warranto under these statutes, but that the action can be brought only by individuals with special interests.2

The appellate courts add: “The private interest alleged must be directly, substantially and adversely affected by the action sought to be challenged in the quo warranto proceeding. The damage to that private interest must be then occurring or certain to occur; the petitioner cannot rely on an expected damage to his private interest.” Significantly, the court adds that “the private interest of one citizen may be an interest shared by other members of the community for purposes of establishing quo warranto standing.”6

§ 4.26 THE INITIAL PLEADING OF THE APPLICANT – THE COMPLAINT, PETITION OR INFORMATION

Generally, as in other civil actions, the initial pleading of an applicant for quo warranto or its statutory equivalent is denominated a complaint.1 Occasionally it is referred to as a petition,2 or an information.3

When the attorney general brings the action in quo warranto in vindication of a public right, it has customarily only been necessary that he allege in general terms that the defendant is unlawfully usurping a public office or franchise, there being no need to set forth the particular facts.4 Even when a private individual is bringing this kind of action to vindicate public rights, it has not ordinarily been necessary for him to do more than allege the defendant was usurping the public office or franchise without lawful authority.5 The rule permitting such broad pleading has often been criticized, and modern statutes have been drawn so as to require greater specificity.6

When an individual is the real party in interest in bringing action for quo warranto, his pleading must positively, with certainty and specificity set forth the facts on which he relies.7 They must be set forth clearly and without ambiguity,8 sufficient to indicate the unlawful nature of the defendant’s actions.9 Legal conclusions are not sufficient.10 In some states the complaint must allege that the individual seeking relief has a private interest in the matter and that the action sought to be challenged by quo warranto has harmed that interest.11 When an individual making application for quo warranto is able, as under many statutes, to assert his own claim to the office occupied by the incumbent defendant, the plaintiff must set forth facts indicating his own right to the office.12

(Record Master)
Who can allege their interests were harmed? Who has a private interest? Who can assert their own claim to the office occupied by the incumbent defendent? Who can set forth the facts and is considered a “real party” in interest in bringing action for quo warranto?

SARAH PALIN
She is an individual that is the real party in interest in bringing action for quo warranto.

Sara Palin could file a complaint/petition via the federal quo warranto statute at 16-3501:

“A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.”

Leo D.
As you can see, the statute is very specific. The office of President is in the District of Columbia. The District Court for the District of Columbia is the only court which has the authority to hear a quo warranto complaint to remove a US national office holder from the District of Columbia .

The only remaining statute which controls quo warranto is the District of Columbia Code. And all actions brought thereunder must be brought in the District Court for the District of Columbia.

Judge Carter: “The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that district.”

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
C. Quo Warranto Claims (Judge Carter Ruling)

Plaintiffs encourage the Court to issue a quo warranto writ against President Obama
challenging the President’s right to hold his office. The Complaint recognizes that the District of Columbia would be the appropriate district in which to bring this writ, but alleges that bringing this request to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia would be futile because the United States Attorney is biased and Judge Robertson within that district had already rejected a similar case in which President Obama’s qualifications were challenged.

Compl. ¶¶ 32 – 35.
The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because
President Obama holds office within that district. The quo warranto provision codified in the District of Columbia Code provides, “A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military.” D.C. Code §§ 16-3501 – 16-3503. Should a person other than the Attorney General of the United States or the United States Attorney wish to bring a quo warranto claim, that person must receive leave of court to do so. Id. at § 16-3502. This leave of court must be granted, according to the text of the statute, by the District Court for the District of Columbia.

At oral argument, Plaintiffs encouraged the Court to apply the District of Columbia’s quo
warranto statute pursuant to California choice-of-law provisions because the District of
Columbia is the residence of Defendants. Plaintiffs’ contention is wholly misplaced because,
while this Court can apply the law of other jurisdictions where appropriate, it is precluded from robbing the D.C. court of jurisdiction as to any quo warranto writ against President Obama because the D.C. Code grants exclusive jurisdiction to the District Court for the District of Columbia. Plaintiffs’ quo warranto demand is hereby DISMISSED for improper venue.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Judge Cater Ruling Case No SACV 09-0082 DOC-AN 10/29/2009

POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE.

Congress is the branch the Constitution empowers to remove a sitting President. The power to judicially enforce any review of POTUS eligibility is a pre-requisite to judicial involvement as the federal courts do not have the power to issue simple advisory opinions. A declaratory judgment is more than an advisory opinion. This is because a declaratory judgment must have the power of enforcement attached whereas an advisory opinion does not.

The declaratory judgment requests of plaintiffs in the Barnett case had to be dismissed because the court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. It’s really that simple. Judge Carter’s analysis of this issue was perfect.

QUO WARRANTO

Because a quo warranto is the only proper action to review the eligibility of a sitting President – and because such an action requires a trial of facts – Congress empowered the DC District Court to hold such a trial (by jury if requested by either party) when the eligibility of the President (or any US national office holder) is called into question.

There is no political question doctrine defense available to a sitting President for a quo warranto brought in the DC District Court. This is because Congress properly exercised its Constitutional authority to review a President’s eligibility via the quo warranto statute which also provides for the removal of an ineligible person from that office if necessary.

The US Attorney General and the US attorney have been empowered by Congress to institute a quo warranto on their own volition. Furthermore, any person may request that these officers do the same. If consent is not given by the DOJ, section 3503 of the quo warranto statute allows an “interested person” to petition the DC District Court on its own. The Barnett plaintiffs failed to avail themselves of this option.

Additionally, the Department of Justice has created a genuine conflict of interest as to 3502 requests by any “third person” (meaning any citizen). By defending the President in this eligibility litigation involving quo warranto, it isn’t possible for the Department of Justice to remain impartial.

Therefore, either a special prosecutor must be named for purposes of allowing the Congressional intent of the quo warranto statute to be realized, or the DC District Court may waive the requirement and examine any verified petition on its own consent.

The conflict will eventually be tested in the DC District Court.

JUDGE CARTER DID NOT HOLD THAT QUO WARRANTO WAS IMPROPER TO CHALLENGE THE ELIGIBILITY OF A SITTING PRESIDENT.

This was the most extraordinary part of today’s ruling. It opens the door wide for a proper eligibility challenge in the DC District Court where the hurdle for standing is different from ordinary federal cases.

Please take note that the Department of Justice attorneys argued before Judge Carter that quo warranto – even if brought properly in the DC District Court – could not be used to challenge the eligibility of a sitting President. Judge Carter’s ruling did not support the Department of Justice position.

The ruling today affirms that the proper venue for challenging the eligibility of a sitting President is the DC District Court.

This is a very encouraging ruling for those contemplating a quo warranto challenge to President Obama’s eligibility in the DC District Court.

Here is Judge Carter’s correct ruling on the quo warranto issue:

C. Quo Warranto Claims…

The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that district. The quo warranto provision codified in the District of Columbia Code provides, “A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military.” D.C. Code §§ 16-3501 – 16-3503. Should a person other than the Attorney General of the United States or the United States Attorney wish to bring a quo warranto claim, that person must receive leave of court to do so. Id. at § 16-3502. This leave of court must be granted, according to the text of the statute, by the District Court for the District of Columbia.

Nothing in today’s ruling appears to question the power of the DC District Court to issue a writ of quo warranto to President Obama which would require him to prove his eligibility to hold the office of President. I must commend Judge Carter for his exercise of judicial restraint on this issue. (Leo Donofrio)

……………………………………………………………………………..

Sarah Palin or Geral Walpin could today bring obama to his knees if she would petition the DC District Court by using the Quo Warranto Federal Law In Washington DC.

Sarah Palin or Geral Walpin can challenge obama as an ursurper to the office of the President and succeed.

Sarah, Geral why have you not done this? I have not heard you speak of any challenge to Obama.

America is waiting for you to take action. America needs you to seek to remove obama because he was not a natural born citizen at birth. You have standing with the DC District Court through Quo Warranto.

Please expose obama before it is too late!!

Quo Warranto Information At Constitution.org

………………………………………………………………………………
Leo ‘our quaterback’ was moving the ‘ball’ down the field of Quo Warranto with this information below. It is the template or outline for a “game changer”. Our ‘quarter back’ has now punted for ‘less points’. I want to win Leo. I didn’t want to settle for ‘less points’. Leo has left the ‘game’ because he is injured. I think Leo is frustrated with other lawyers who have used the system incorrectly. I hope Leo is able to return to the “game” soon and take the “ball”, “Quo Warranto” to the Dc Court and win the “game”!

………………………………………………………………………………
Leo Donofrio

“The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion…”

“By virtue of their position, they, at their discretion and acting under the sense of official responsibility, can institute such proceedings in any case they deem proper.”

“IN ANY CASE THEY DEEM PROPER.”

- There is no qualification that there be a certain amount of evidence one way or the other.

- There is no qualification that the officials must consider public opinion or political party affiliation.

- There is no “standing” to prove. If your title is US Attorney General or United States attorney, you have standing.

- There is no need to consult with Congress because, as SCOTUS noted in their opinion, Congress has already acted on the issue by enacting the quo warranto statute.

All that is required is that the official deems a quo warranto statute proper. His discretion is unassailable judicially.

Even if both officials are convinced Obama is eligible, it’s still proper for them institute a quo warranto proceeding because the evidence emerging now is that, by leaving the controversy as is, a floodgate of litigation will ensue. And like the waters over New Orleans levees, this floodgate has the ability to wreak havoc on our nation.

Regardless of whether one believes Obama’s online COLB is real, no citizen can tell the Government to check a web site for their birth certificate rather than bring it in to the DMV or send it to the federal Government for a passport. You have to actually mail your BC in to them if you don’t bring it in person.

I recognize that the Constitution does not require a birth certificate as a qualification, but that’s not the issue anymore.

The issue is whether the Attorney General and/or a United States attorney deems it proper for Obama to provide the same proof of identity as ordinary citizens in order to avoid FORESEEABLE complications which are destined to rot public faith.

Obama ought to encourage these officials to institute an action in quo warranto for the good of the nation and for the good of his own legacy.

THREE WAYS TO BRING QUO WARRANTO

1. The US attorney and/or the US Attorney General institute the case on their own motion – which is the best way this could happen. No leave of the court need be requested. There will be a hearing and a trial of facts.

2. If no authorized Government attorneys will bring the action on their own motion, then any citizen may join a law suit as “third persons” and such law suit, by way of verified petition, shall be brought to the US Attorney and/or the Attorney General to ask their consent to use the name of the United States. If the Government gives consent, then you must request permission from the court to bring the suit as well. And if the Court says yes, you will have a hearing on the merits.

3. If the Government will not give consent, then “interested persons” may request leave of the court to institute the action in quo warranto. But standing will be – according to SCOTUS in Newman – restricted to anybody who was ousted from the office of POTUS (and nobody is going to meet that requirement) or, in the alternative there might by cases under the civil service laws which provide standing.

3. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF TITLE 16 CHAPTER 35 (Quo Warranto) OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CODE.

Chapter 35 is entitled “QUO WARRANTO”. Subchapter I is entitled “Actions Against Officers of the United States.” Subchapter II is entitled “Actions Against Officers or Corporations of the District of Columbia“. Please note that the original DC quo warranto statute was first enacted in 1901. While SCOTUS interpreted that statute as controlling national officers, Congress modified the statute in 1963 to its current form which erases any possible doubt that the statute applies to all Officers of the United States.

Furthermore, the District of Columbia Code is federal law. It’s enacted by Congress and the actual United States Constitution is included in the District of Columbia code. I have seen the most erroneous comments online wherein it has been argued that a “local DC code is not federal law”. Besides the ultimate federal law – the Constitution – being placed directly in the DC code, SCOTUS has stated – in the seminal quo warranto DC code case, Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537 (1915) – that the District Code applies to all…

“…actions in quo warranto instituted by authorized parties against national officers of the United States, they are general laws of the United States, and not merely local laws of the District of Columbia…”

I must reiterate that the code’s text does not provide any exceptions for any public office, not even POTUS.

CONCLUSION: The District of Columbia Code is the only means by which a federal quo warranto action can be instituted and its application is strictly limited to public offices of the United States or local DC offices within the ten square miles of the District of Columbia. No public office, ie POTUS, is exempt by the statute.

THE WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO

……………………………………………………………………………..
Petition The DOJ as “third persons” under 16-3502 and get permission of the DOJ to use the name of the US in a quo warranto proceeding! Out Obama.

I have recorded additional information Leo Donofrio has written about Quo Warranto. This information is available at the link below and I will post it again here. Leo explains Juge Carter’s ruling and documents how the door was left open to Quo Warranto. Leo you need to walk through the door you were talking about for America.

……………………………………………………………………………..

Petition The DOJ as “third persons” under 16-3502 and get permission of the DOJ to use the name of the US in a quo warranto proceeding! Out Obama.

Petition The DOJ as “third persons” under 16-3502 and get permission of the DOJ to use the name of the US in a quo warranto proceeding! Out Obama.

Leo Donofrio

Congress has not defined “natural born citizen” while they have defined “naturalized citizen” and “citizen by statute”. Since neither the Congress nor the courts have defined “natural born citizen”, we are left without a legal working definition.

Faced with a sitting President who admits to having been a British citizen at birth, the need for a quo warranto to be instituted is of the utmost importance to the future of this nation.

“The DC District Court”, has the power, “to issue a writ of quo warranto to President Obama which would require him to prove his eligibility to hold the office of President.”

JUDGE CARTER DID NOT HOLD THAT QUO WARRANTO WAS IMPROPER TO CHALLENGE THE ELIGIBILITY OF A SITTING PRESIDENT.

This was the most extraordinary part of today’s ruling. It opens the door wide for a proper eligibility challenge in the DC District Court where the hurdle for standing is different from ordinary federal cases.

QUO WARRANTO

Because a quo warranto is the only proper action to review the eligibility of a sitting President – and because such an action requires a trial of facts – Congress empowered the DC District Court to hold such a trial (by jury if requested by either party) when the eligibility of the President (or any US national office holder) is called into question.

There is no political question doctrine defense available to a sitting President for a quo warranto brought in the DC District Court. This is because Congress properly exercised its Constitutional authority to review a President’s eligibility via the quo warranto statute which also provides for the removal of an ineligible person from that office if necessary.

The US Attorney General and the US attorney have been empowered by Congress to institute a quo warranto on their own volition. Furthermore, any person may request that these officers do the same. If consent is not given by the DOJ, section 3503 of the quo warranto statute allows an “interested person” to petition the DC District Court on its own.

The Department of Justice has created a genuine conflict of interest as to 3502 requests by any “third person” (meaning any citizen). By defending the President in this eligibility litigation involving quo warranto, it isn’t possible for the Department of Justice to remain impartial.

Therefore, either a special prosecutor must be named for purposes of allowing the Congressional intent of the quo warranto statute to be realized, or the DC District Court may waive the requirement and examine any verified petition on its own consent.

The conflict will eventually be tested in the DC District Court.

(Leo will you test it? Can you follow through with the ‘conflict’? Don’t let America down)
………………………………………………………………………………
Here is Judge Carter’s correct ruling on the quo warranto issue:
………………………………………………………………………………

C. Quo Warranto Claims…

The writ of quo warranto must be brought within the District of Columbia because President Obama holds office within that district. The quo warranto provision codified in the District of Columbia Code provides, “A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military.” D.C. Code §§ 16-3501 – 16-3503. Should a person other than the Attorney General of the United States or the United States Attorney wish to bring a quo warranto claim, that person must receive leave of court to do so. Id. at § 16-3502. This leave of court must be granted, according to the text of the statute, by the District Court for the District of Columbia.

Nothing in today’s ruling appears to question the power of the DC District Court to issue a writ of quo warranto to President Obama which would require him to prove his eligibility to hold the office of President. I must commend Judge Carter for his exercise of judicial restraint on this issue. (Leo Donofrio)

………………………………………………………………………………

Quo Warranto For “Interested Persons

Section 16-3503 of the federal quo warranto statute allows an “interested person” to approach the DC District Court concerning a quo warranto trial (by jury) without requiring the permission of the US Attorney General or the US Attorney for DC.

An “interested person” may sign a “certified complaint” which states facts and those facts must be sworn to under penalty of perjury. Only facts may be sworn to, not allegations. The “interested person” gathers up all facts known to him/her and puts them in the petition, swears to them under oath and hands that in to the Court. Pretty simple, folks.

One fact which could safely be sworn to is that Obama was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 and that he was – at birth – a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies. These are facts admitted by Obama. These facts have never been laid before the DC District Court.

16-3503 states:

If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person…

All citizens are considered “third persons” under 16-3502, but all citizens don’t have unique standing and therefore 16-3502 requires permission by the Department of Justice to use the name of the US – ex relator – ina quo warranto proceeding.

If you are an “interested person” under 16-3503 – aka a person with unique standing – then you do not need permission from the Department of Justice for the quo warranto.

The DC District Court examines the certified petition prior to allowing the suit to go forth based upon that petition. If the court is satisfied that the person issuing the petition is an “interested person” then that person is not needed any longer for the trial.

Once the name of the United States is allowed to be used, the “interested person” may step off, and the facts alleged are to be tried independently.

The trial is brought against the alleged usurper in the name of the United States.

Quo warranto can only be invoked against somebody holding an office under false title.

Quo warranto only applies to actual usurpation not possible usurpation. It is the legislature’s sole enactment which allows judicial review of the President’s eligibility. And it appears that serious attempts are being made to avoid it. Before going off point and trying to force this issue upon courts which have not been given such authority, an action should have been brought – and still can be – under 16-3503.
……………………………………………………………………………..
Leo Explains Quo Warranto Radio Interview


………………………………………………………………………………

quo warranto

“By what warrant do you hold office”?

The DOJ is now in direct conflict of interest by defending him in the Barnett case. But for 16-3503 their permission is not necessary. The statute says the case may be prosecuted by “any attorney”.

How Congress Is Sanitizing The Natural Born Issue

Everyone needs to read this report. It’s truly one of the best articles ever written on the natural born citizen issue. Leo D.

………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………
What a citizen can do to EXPOSE THE FRAUD obama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………

Apply to DOJ is first step. If they refuse and you are an “interested person” then according to 16-3503 you may go before the court without their permission to use the name of the US…if the court finds your petition sufficient in law then the writ will issue and the President will stand trial.

Remember:

All citizens are considered “third persons” under 16-3502, but all citizens don’t have unique standing and therefore 16-3502 requires permission by the Department of Justice to use the name of the US – ex relator – ina quo warranto proceeding.

(Lets All Petition The DOJ as “third persons” under 16-3502 and get permission of the DOJ to use the name of the US in a quo warranto proceeding!) Story Reports

*****************************************************************************************
NOTE HOW TO EXPOSE THE FRAUD OBAMA IN DC COURT!
*****************************************************************************************

Section 16-3503 of the federal quo warranto statute allows an “interested person” to approach the DC District Court concerning a quo warranto trial (by jury) without requiring the permission of the US Attorney General or the US Attorney for DC.

An “interested person” may sign a “certified complaint” which states facts and those facts must be sworn to under penalty of perjury. Only facts may be sworn to, not allegations. The “interested person” gathers up all facts known to him/her and puts them in the petition, swears to them under oath and hands that in to the Court. Pretty simple, folks.

One fact which could safely be sworn to is that Obama was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 and that he was – at birth – a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies. These are facts admitted by Obama. These facts have never been laid before the DC District Court.

16-3503 states:

If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person…

All citizens are considered “third persons” under 16-3502, but all citizens don’t have unique standing and therefore 16-3502 requires permission by the Department of Justice to use the name of the US – ex relator – ina quo warranto proceeding.

Don’t get confused. Unless your an intersted person under 16-3503 you need permission to go before the court.

*****Everybody: 16-3502*****

Petition The DOJ as “third persons” under 16-3502 and get permission of the DOJ to use the name of the US in a quo warranto proceeding! Then you become an “interested person” and sign a “certified complaint” which states facts and those facts must be sworn to under penalty of perjury. One fact which could safely be sworn to is that Obama was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 and that he was – at birth – a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies. These are facts admitted by Obama. These facts have never been laid before the DC District Court.

This is what I can do and any US citizen that is not an “interested person” such as Sarah Palin or Geral Walpin for example. These two people have injured by obama and can go directly to the DC Court.

Leo has provided the template. Leo has deleted the template from his blog. I have preserved it. Leo stated it was for our use. I urge Americans to use this procedure that Leo has said will work. I also believe it will if applied as Leo has explained. I am disappointed that leo has deleted this excellent information on his blog for us to use. Leo must have known someone would preseve it

Comments On

‘Quo Warranto for ‘Interested Persons” – Leo Donofrio; Plus Related Items: Are You ‘Interested?’ Investigating Obama

Leo Donofrio says he is to busy

There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under
certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. One of those circumstances is to
gain the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and
defeat them. (Obama uses both forms) (On this Veterans day I have found it necessary
to promote the truth to all Americans especially those who serve a deceiver in chief.)

From Islamic Law:

Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746) – “Lying is permissible when there
is a legitimate desired end. And the legitimate desired end may be a
personal one.”

Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them.
The two forms are:

Taqiyya – Saying something that isn’t true. (Obama is known for this)

Kitman – Lying by omission. (Obama is also known for this)

This 12 part series reveals who Barrack Hussein Obama is. If you want to know what is behind the mask you will after taking the time to view these 10 min series segments.
There will be no doubt as to who Barrack Hussein Obama is and his purpose for America.
………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Revealing The Truth About Obama

(Revealing the truth about Barrack Hussein Obama By Usama Dakdok)


………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Finally, the circumstances by which Muhammad allowed a believer to lie
are limited to those that either advance the cause of Islam or enable a
Muslim to avoid harm to his well-being (and presumably that of other Muslims
as well). It is not grounds for assuming that the Muslim one might personally
encounter on the street or in the workplace is any less honest than anyone else.

There is an exception when assuming obama is telling you the truth. He is not. He will advance his cause.

 

Affidavit: Written statement made voluntarily, confirmed by the oath or affirmation of the party making it, and signed before an officer empowered to administer such oaths. It usually names the place of execution and certifies that the person making it states certain facts and appeared before the officer on a certain date and “subscribed and swore” to the statement.

“Additionally, it is common knowledge throughout both the Christian and Muslim communities in Kenya, that contrary to news media propaganda here in the United States, US Senator Barack Obama is a Muslim and not a Christian, and that he was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not in the State of Hawaii.”

“It is a known fact that membership in the United Church of Christ in Chicago, where Barack Obama was a member, does not require muslims to renounce their Islamic faith in order to join the UCC church.”
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
This obama record indicates obama is a muslim and was born in Kenya not Hawaii. I would like to know where the “common knowledge” throughout Kenya about obama originated.
(record Master)

If you believe this affidavit it has more clout than the online “certification of live birth” obama has put forth as evidence he was born in Hawaii. Remember obama has not sworn to anything. Bishop Ron Mcrae has sworn to this affidavit. This affidavit is a real record filed in court. Obama has filed a sworn statement on a form in Arizona that he is a naturnal born citizen but this is a fraudulent affidavit that was filed before the election.

Obama committed fraud and not immune from prosecution in Arizona

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

This affidavit is part of the Berg Case:

Affidavit of Bishop Ron McRae, I, Bishop Ron McRae am over the age of eighteen (18) and not a party to the within action. If called to do so, I could and would competently testify under oath as follows:

I am the Continental Bishop who oversees the Anabaptists Churches in North America. I am also the Presiding Elder on the African Presbytery, where we have numerous churches throughout Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and mission works to several other African nations. The African Presbytery is comprised of the national bishops of the various countries we minister in and support, along with our statewide bishops from New York and Pennsylvania.

We actively visit and minister throughout these African countries, and do so extensively throughout all of Kenya these last three (3) years. in overseeing the establishment of our churches and presbytery to Kenya over the last two (2) years we have had personal dealings, continually, with many citizens of Kenya from every tribe and economic standing throughout the wonderful nation of Kenya, with whom the national interests in United States Senator Barack Hussein Obama is a very popular topic of discussion. The tribal cultures of the Kenyanese people have involved much turmoil during the national elections at the end of December 2007 and the beginning of 2008.

The much published violence that erupted over the presidential elections caught the world’s attention. Myself and several American minister with our church were present during this time in Kenya, and the facts concerning this strife and the ensuing violence were well known, and of common knowledge throughout all of Kenya.

The opposition party that was responsible for all of the violence was from the minority Luo tribe, which is a Muslim tribe that supported Mr. Raila Odinga for president. Raila Odinga is a Marxist socialist who graduated from the East Germany Magdeburg University in 1970 on a scholarship from the East German government. He named his first born son after Fidel Castro. Raila Odinga spent six years in prison for his admitted involvement in the bloody coup attempt in 1982 to over take and assissinate Daniel Arap Moi, Kenya’s President. Mr. Odinga has publicly admitted to being the leader of that coup in his 2006.

Mr. Odinga is the cousin of United States Senator Barack Obama. Mr. Obama is from the same Muslim tribe, the Luo Tribe, as Mr. Odinga. Senator Obama visited Kenya in August of 2006 and campaigned extensively for his cousin, Mr. Odinga, which gave Odinga a tremendous boost. During Senator Obama’s campaign stops on behalf of his cousin Odinga, the Senator made numerous claims against the democratic government of Kenya and Kenya’s Presidcent Mwai Kibaki, claiming they were corrupt, stating often, that Kenya was “ready for change”, just as he has campaigned here in the United States during the Presidential election. It has been common knowledge throughout Kenya that Senator Obama sent his foreign policy advisor, Mr. Mark Lippert, to Kenya at least three times to advise Mr.Odinga on his campaign strategies. See Mark Hyman’s Washington Times article published October, 12, 2008, attached as Exhibit “I”. Moreover, everyone in Kenya is well aware that Senator Obama donated over one million American dollars ($1,000,000) to his cousin’s, Mr. Odinga’s campaign, which is documented in the Kenyan Political Party, for Mr. Odinga. Orange Democratic Movement (hereinafter “ODM”) along with extensive funds from other Muslim supporters including but not limited to the Muslim son of Muammar Gadhafi, the dictator of Libyan’s Muslim government. These issues are common knowledge throughout Kenya, and the information is publicly document across the internet.

It is detailed in Odinga’s financial reports and strategies ODM Internal Memo documents, attached as Exhibit “2″, which are public records, that a significant portion of Senator Obama’s financial contributions (made through an organization identified as Friends of Senator Barack Obama) were used to help finance both the signed Muslim Memorandum of Understanding as well as the planned violence, murders and bloodshed that occurred in December of 2007. Within the ODM Internal Memo attached as Exhibit “2″, the funds donated by Mr. Obama through “Friends of Senator Barack Obama” were to be used for “Violence as a last result…to discourage voter participation in hostile areas..use ODM agents on the ground to engineer ethnic tensions in target areas…support Kapondi’s forces in Mt. Eglori”, and to do as during “Mid-December”. Unfortunately, the exact violence described in these reports was carried out and occurred at the beginning of the second week of December 2007.

Additionally, it is common knowledge throughout both the Christian and Muslim communities in Kenya, that contrary to news media propaganda here in the United States, US Senator Barack Obama is a Muslim and not a Christian, and that he was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not in the State of Hawaii as falsely purported by the Obama campaign for presidency of the United States. Mr. Obama’s cousin ran his failed campaign for the Kenyan presidency in the identical fashion of Senator Obama’s American campaign strategy, and that being to join a nominal Christian Church in order to publicly profess to be a Christian, while maintaining their actual Muslim beliefs, in order to sway public opinion away from the actual fact of his strong Muslim beliefs, family and goals. It is a known fact that membership in the United Church of Christ in Chicago, where Barack Obama was a member, does not require muslims to renounce their Islamic faith in order to join the UCC church. Throughout Kenya it is and was well publicized in the media that a Memorandum of Understanding agrement, attached as Exhibit “3″, between Raila Odinga and Shiek Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum, was signed by Odinga in August 29, 2007 in which Raila Odinga promised if elected to implement drastic changes including but not limited to the following:

* Recognize “Islam as the only true religion” * “Islamic leaders would have an oversight rule to monitor activities of ALL other religions (emphasis in the original) * Installation of Shariah courts in every jurisdiction to implement Islamic law * Implement a ban on Christian preaching

Because of the seriousness of all of the above, as a Christian and a citizen of the United States, this preacher could no longer sit idly by knowing these things and continue to minister in both Kenya and the United States. As the presiding bishop over the Continental Presbytery of Africa, I authorized representatives within our church to locate and interview Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama, the actual grandmother of US Senator Barack Obama. Ms. Sarah Obama lives in the Alego-Kogello, approximately 37 miles from Kisumu, where the Anabaptists have a congregation, and where this preacher has preached several times prior to the December elections in 2007, and prior to the planned violence from the Odinga supporters, which erupted.

With Senator Obama being born in Kenya and not in the United States, he is not a “natural born” citizen and it prohibits him from being eligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States. Since Senator Obama’s birth was reportedly in 1961, birth records may or may not be available, so I felt it very important to obtain the testimony of his grandmother as a first hand witness, since it is commonly known throughout Kenya, and especiallyaround the Kisamu area, that Sarah Obama was present when Barack Obama, Jr. was born in Kenya.

Accordingly, on Thursday, October 16, 2008 Reverend Kweli Shuhudia (actual name temporarily withheld to protect his life), an evangelist with our ministries traveled to Kogello and located Ms. Sarah Obama at her home, see the attached email attached as Exhibit “4″. Mr. Shuhudu is a very intelligent and educated citizen of Africa, a former teacher and respected evangelist throughout Africa. Mr. Shuhudia acts as our official translator when we are in Africa, and is fluent in both Swahili and English. Mr. Shahudu met and interviewed Ms. Sarah Obama at length on October 16th during which interview, he called me on my mobile number, see my phone record attached as Exhibit “6″. Mr Shuhudia called me first on october 16th at 10:33 a.m. and advised that hwe was with Sarah Hussein Obama and that she wanted to speak with me, but the connection was lost. He called me right back at 10:35 a.m. and he informed me that there were several hundred people present, celebrating Obama’s success. I questioned him about the format of the phone call and conversation with Ms. Obama, and then informed him that I would call him right back, so it would not cost him international charges for the call. I called him back at 10:40 a.m. and public music and voices could be heard that were gathered around Kweli Shuhudia. I then spoke with him and requested that htey utilize the speaker phone so everyone could hear.

The speaker phone with its open microphone was utilized with Mr. Shuhdia, Mr. Vatalis Alec Ogombe the Kogelo Community chairman assisting in the translation work and Ms. Sarh Hussein, along with several hundred people including policemen present and listenin in the open conversation between the four of us for approximately 15 minutes. Mr. VO is also the step grandson of Ms. Obama and the cousin of Barack Obama. A third unknown party can be heard periodically interjecting both Swahili and English words in the public discussion and conversation between the four of us. At times, the room noise from other peoples’ voices makes some of the swahili difficult to hear, and towards the end of the conversation several men’s voices are heard that are not identified. As I talked to and question Ms. Obama publicly over the open microphone of Mr. S’s speaker phone, they would translate what I said to her in Swahili publicly, and then they would translate her Swahili responses to me publicly in English. Ms. Obama can fluently speak Swahili in her native dialect, but cannot read or write. In the ensuing public conversation, I asked Ms. Obama specifically, “Were you present when your grandson Barack Obama was born in Kenya?” this was asked to her in translation twice, and both times she specifically replied, “Yes! Yes she was! She was present when Obama was born.” Though, some few younger relatives, including Mr. Ogombe, have obviously been versed to counter such facts with the common purported information from the American news media that Obama was born in Hawaii, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama was very adamant that her grandson, Senator Barack Hussein Obama, was born in Kenya, and that she was present and witnessed his birth in Kenya, not the United States. When Mr. Ogombe attempted to counter Sarah Obama’ clear responses to the question, verifying the birth of Senator Barack Obama in Kenya, I asked Mr. Ogombe, how she could be present at Barack Obama’s birth if the Senator was born in Hawaii, but Ogombe would not answer the question, instead he repeatedly tried to insert that, “No, No, No, He was born in the United States!” But during the conversation, Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama never changed her reply that she was in deed present when Senator Barack Obama was born in Kenya. A transcript of this taped public interview is attached as Exhibit “6″. Mr. Shuhudia took photographs during the open conversations and interview with Ms. Sarah Hussein Obama, which photos will be forthcoming.

Becase of the seriousness of the political situation and the impact of such on a United States Presidential election, and because of the factual reality of tremendous violence in kenya towards Christians, especially in the immediate area of Kisumu, where both Sarah Hussein Obama and Rev. Kweli Shuhudia live, it is requested that all reasonable and legal steps be taken to secure Rev. Kweli Shuhudia’s identity to the Federal Court alone, in order to protect his life and safety for being willing to provide this very important assistance in gathering this testimony and evidence to be used in any Federal litigation.

The above related facts are true and verifiable to the best of my personal knowledge before God Almighty, whom I am and whom I serve.

I declare under the penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States, that the foregoing is true and correct.

by the grace of God alone,

Ron McRae Residing Bishop Continental Presbytery of Africa Anabaptists Churches of N. America

Sohale "Hal" Siddiqi, a drug addicted illegal alien from Pakistan and Obama.

(Record Master)
Obama has so few records I thought this “stink” of a “poem” should be published.

“Pop,” written when Obama was 19. This crude ‘poem” could be about obama himself sitting in his seat, sprinkled with ashes, smoking pot, taking another shot of seagrams, stain on his shorts, makes me smell his smell, coming from obama and his buddy Siddiqi, a drug addicted illegal alien from Pakistan. Obama a flim and flam “no record” of the world, since things have been easy for him, from under his seat pulls out the mirror he’s been saving, laughing, looking at himself, a narcissistic personality laughing loud at Americans who believe in freedom. Obama fails to pass the smell test. With heavy lobes obama’s still telling his jokes and the state run media is running laugh tracks with every fake quote and every broad and broken comment.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Pop

Sitting in his seat, a seat broad and broken
In, sprinkled with ashes,
Pop switches channels, takes another
Shot of Seagrams, neat, and asks
What to do with me, a green young man
Who fails to consider the
Flim and flam of the world, since
Things have been easy for me;
I stare hard at his face, a stare
That deflects off his brow;
I’m sure he’s unaware of his
Dark, watery eyes, that
Glance in different directions,
And his slow, unwelcome twitches,
Fail to pass.
I listen, nod,
Listen, open, till I cling to his pale,
Beige T-shirt, yelling,
Yelling in his ears, that hang
With heavy lobes, but he’s still telling
His joke, so I ask why
He’s so unhappy, to which he replies . . .
But I don’t care anymore, cause
He took too damn long, and from
Under my seat, I pull out the
Mirror I’ve been saving; I’m laughing,
Laughing loud, the blood rushing from his face
To mine, as he grows small,
A spot in my brain, something
That may be squeezed out, like a
Watermelon seed between
Two fingers.
Pop takes another shot, neat,
Points out the same amber
Stain on his shorts that I’ve got on mine and
Makes me smell his smell, coming
From me; he switches channels, recites an old poem
He wrote before his mother died,
Stands, shouts, and asks
For a hug, as I shink, my
Arms barely reaching around
His thick, oily neck, and his broad back; ’cause
I see my face, framed within
Pop’s black-framed glasses
And know he’s laughing too.

– Barack Obama

………………………………………………………………………………………………………
The most telling line in the poem is one of the shortest. The line is “Fail to pass.”

Obama is a failure. A failure immersed in himself. A “man child” as rush calls him.

Obama fails and his failures are passed over by the “state run media”. Obama fails to answer question concerning his college records, birth records, or any record.

Obama fails to pass the smell test.

The smell test is documentation proving and authenticating obama’s past record of performance based on academic achievements in any school or college he says he attended.

Obama has not presented anything confirming academic achievements anytime except for a “stink” of a “poem” that “fails to pass” the test of real achievement.

This “poem” is one of a couple of “performance” records of obama that has surfaced.

This “poem” is record of obama’s performance. It is slim evidence of achievement. In fact it proves obama is best described as an underachiever. A lame excuse for confidence in obama. This is the evidence we have to be able to say obama is a scholar, a learned person.

Obama’s “scholarship” is in the form of an affirmative action “no record” promoted as an intellectual. Obama has been promoted as a “super hero” to save America.

Obama is as fake as any “super hero” in any comic book. He is a figment of the imagination of public relations firms who were paid over $260,000,000. to promote the comic book hero “obama”.

Obama the “hero” is a real zero. Nothing from nothing leaves nothing.

Obama has no records to share with the public authenticating his person except pr spin.

Obama is a figment of no imagination. He really is an empty suit.

 

Obama Record Found In Concrete

ObamaKing

(TerryK Comments etc)

Barack Obama is possibly the son of cousins, Stanley Ann Dunham and Frank Marshall Davis — and Hawaiian royalty — perhaps heir to the Hawaiian throne.

Obama called himself “king Obama” while a student in the late 1970s. Barack Obama carved his name in the pavement outside the cafeteria of Punahou School.

Imagine the Hawaiian Homestead lands and the Hawaiian Crown Lands are like an insular government. It’s an insular foreign government found on U.S. soil in a way. But the trust and treaty say that land is under the local foreign government’s jurisdiction. Much like a Native American reservation.

MORE reason to suspect FMD has the bloodline, too. Possibly Obama is VERY closely related or he wouldn’t have had the help and motivation to do what he’s done! Possibly both his mother and father are part of the bloodline.

“My mom not being an arranged birth like my grandpa and grandma–makes me not from that origin of Papa and Wakea.”

Arranged birth, possibly, this is what happened with BHO!

The point is that the Crown Lands and Homestead lands are SOVEREIGN without the rest of the state being sovereign.

There’s a hawaiian tradition of Hanai, an adoption of royal children at birth to other chiefs and family. Most often to GRANDPARENTS for raising. All of the last queen’s ten siblings were adopted out in a hanai.

It’s the Homestead Lands and Crown Lands that are under their own government that’s important to understand.

I think Obama was born, perhaps, on some of that land.

Emma Dunham could be related to the Dunhams. I think SAD is the mother and in the tradition of hanai, his grandparents mostly raised BHO. However, I think F M DAVIS is the biological father with the bloodline, too. Possibly BHO Sr. was chosen as a ’second father’ in the Tradition of Queen Ruth, because of his indigenous ties to the luo tribe and experience with colonialization. Possibly BHO Sr. was adopted into the tribe in the tradition of hanai too while he was a student in Hawaii.

About Emma Bernice Bishop Dunham, born April 7, 1861, at Drytown, California-died Jan. 19,1924 at oakland, california (from Mormon website). Only had one sibling that lived to adulthood-George Lewis Dunham. Please note Gabriella Clark, on Obama family tree Chicago Sun-Times, born 1877. Question: could she be hanai? Notice Harry Ellington Armour’s mother’s name? Anne? Just conjecture–completely tinfoil–if Gabriella is Emma Bernice’s hanai, then Stanley Armour Dunham has a name that traces the connection. In this scenerio the unknown Anne would trace back to Elizabeth Davis, who I am guessing would trace back to Caroline Elizabeth Gilliland who could be related to Bernice Paki. Brother’s marrying sisters? it happened a lot back then.

It especially happened with the Hawaiian Royals.

Remember the act where they were trying to give those of foreign birth Hawaiian birth certificates?? Obama could theoretically have been born anywhere in the world, but had familial lines in Hawaii and would be considered native Hawaiian, and thus a Natural born American citizen as defined by Hawaiians.

A Hawaiian can collect additional names with age. The name given at birth might reflect prophesy or a hope that the child will grow to develop certain qualities. As they grow and change, Hawaiians are sometimes given new names in addition to their first name as their circumstances change throughout life.

As with King Kamehameha, his first name was Pai’ea, which meant crab, because he would cling to his caregiver like a crab. Once he became more outgoing, he was called Kamehameha because of his brassy qualities. He carried both names throughout his life, and collected many more along the way. ”

“The Hawaiian language is based on about 200 words, which makes naming a child tricky. A parent has to be careful when choosing the name to avoid a “kaona” (pronounced “cow-na”), or hidden meaning”

Remember how it was pointed out that Lolo’s name meant ‘Crazy’ or ‘crazy head’ or something like that?

Islamic Tactics of Taqqiya teaches Muslims to practise Deception , Fraud & Double Standards to spread Islam…

Frank Marshall Davis and the Dunhams were from Kansas.

Remember obama has left a record carved in concrete. It says, “king obama”.

(What does all this mean? I guess it could possibly mean obama was born in Hawaii but not in the state of Hawaii. He could have been born on “tribal land” and is possibly some kind of descendant of the royal hawaiian family or something. If so it means he again is not a US citizen because he was not born in this country. This is speculation but hey we have a “record in concrete”. A concrete record written by obama himself declaring his royal roots. If this is true it wouldn’t suprise me because obama is a con man after all.

 
Obama Has No kindergarden records from Ms. Sakai’s kindergarten class at Noelani Elementary School in 1967.

Obama Has No kindergarden records from Ms. Sakai’s kindergarten class at Noelani Elementary School in 1967.

Born within hours of Obama according to Eleanor Nordyke, their names should be just below obama's's ?

Born within hours of Obama according to Eleanor Nordyke, their names should be just
below obama's

The picture is from Winifred (Wakai) Otaguro, who was in Ms. Sakai’s kindergarten class at Noelani Elementary School in 1967. Otaguro’s mother, Betty Wakai, had written the names of most of the kids in the class on the back of the picture. Her writing identifies the first little boy in the third row as “Barry Obama.” Obama’s sister Maya Soetoro-Ng confirms that the boy is Obama, however, the Department of Education has been unable to find his records.

Obama began his education in Hawaii’s public schools. He was enrolled in Ms. Sakai’s kindergarten class at Noelani Elementary School in 1967. He was only there a couple or three months before he was off to Indonesia.

The two white girls in the same row are probably the Nordyke twins. They were not identical twins, but they did have the same smile. They were born the same time as Obama. Their their birth announcement is missing. Twins, being born to a prominent physician is news. What happened to the space their birth announcement was in.

We are expected to believe that Vital Statistics included Obama’s name on their announcement list, and forgot the Nordyke Twins? Odd?

Born within hours of Obama according to Eleanor Nordyke, their names should be here:

Born within hours of Obama according to Eleanor Nordyke, their names should be here just below obama's but for some strange reason are not?

Born within hours of Obama according to Eleanor Nordyke, their names should be here just below obama's but for some strange reason are not?

Obama’s Noelani Elementary School Kindergarten records, oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education, is the first in a series of “coincidences.”

This is an very important because Kindergarten records for original school entry would have contained the following:

1. Obama’s REAL Long Form Birth Certificate.

2. An application with the following:

• His Legal name.
• Parents or Legal Guardians’ names.
• Date of Birth
• Place of Birth
• Vaccination Records (revealing a timeline to the place and DOB.)

The Department of Education does not “lose” the records of one “particular student”.

In kindergarden there would have been NO shameful low-test scores, NO embarrassing Equal Opportunity advancements, and NO trails of fraudulent funding to hide what could possibly “excuse” the disapperance of public school Kindergarten entry records. There would be only:

• His Legal name.
• Parents or Legal Guardians’ names.
• Date of Birth
• Place of Birth
• Vaccination Records (revealing a timeline to the place and DOB.)

Which would be very revealing.

Hawaii should be able to verify he attended their school since he is featured in class photographs. Why is there no documentation?

Obama joked during the primary campaign that his opponent (Hillary) was even digging into his Kindergarten records. He knows what they would contain and why they must be kept unavailable.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
(Record Master)

The elephant in the room in a BIG NO RECORD. Obama’s life is a NO RECORD.
If it was just his kindergarden records missing it would be different but its ALL his education records and any other documentation that could verify who he is.

This in itself is beyond ODD. The fact the national news media, dnc and all of congress have ignored this fact is beyond ODD also.

Obama has produced nothing to prove who he is except a “certification of live birth” from Hawaii that can’t be confirmed by the public. The “colb” produced by obama has not been certified by an Hawwain registrar. It contains no signatures, no hospital, no doctor and no parents signatures. It is worthless as evidence obama is who he says he is. It is worthless in verifying where obama was born. Just because an Hawaiian offical states she has seen his original colb means nothing also. It is only a statement that CAN’T BE CONFIRMED by anyone! Who is obama? What is obama?